TSTP Solution File: GRP130-2.003 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP130-2.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:28:21 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6723/GRP/GRP130-2.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 71] [nf = 8] [nu = 2] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 189] [nf = 164] [nu = 6] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 404] [nf = 320] [nu = 18] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1121] [nf = 1390] [nu = 30] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2150] [nf = 2460] [nu = 42] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5775] [nf = 8452] [nu = 54] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10616] [nf = 14444] [nu = 66] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28309] [nf = 42456] [nu = 78] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 50866] [nf = 70468] [nu = 90] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 129495] [nf = 192296] [nu = 102] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 227580] [nf = 314124] [nu = 114] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 561425] [nf = 831860] [nu = 126] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 973094] [nf = 1349596] [nu = 138] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 2369091] [nf = 3522528] [nu = 150] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 4076384] [nf = 5695460] [nu = 162] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7028008] [nf = 10262312] [nu = 166] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7028060] [nf = 10262320] [nu = 170] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7028196] [nf = 10262500] [nu = 174] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7028575] [nf = 10262682] [nu = 186] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7031285] [nf = 10266308] [nu = 198] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 7052363] [nf = 10269934] [nu = 210] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7331063] [nf = 10475357] [nu = 222] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 117 secs [nr = 38477841] [nf = 11248643] [nu = 2155898] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 155319491
% resolvents: 94890233 factors: 60429258
% Number of unit clauses generated: 3167546
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 2.04
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14 [2] = 1 [4] = 1 [8] = 37
% Total = 53
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 3167546 [2] = 51445486 [3] = 54979520 [4] = 33641479 [5] = 10637228 [6] = 1448232
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)6
% [2] greater_2 (+)3 (-)2
% [3] next_2 (+)2 (-)3
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)34
% ------------------
% Total: (+)8 (-)45
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 53
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 240580835
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 5263490
% Number of successful unifications: 155319491
% Number of unification failures: 380220569
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 363644591
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 28584010
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 2155616
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1864844
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 37
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 137
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.27
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 535540060
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1864883
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 2.13 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 517732
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------