TSTP Solution File: GRP130-1.005 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP130-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:28:17 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4938/GRP/GRP130-1.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 180] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 444] [nf = 408] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 948] [nf = 808] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 2748] [nf = 3816] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 5508] [nf = 6824] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 15532] [nf = 24304] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 29396] [nf = 41784] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 80396] [nf = 124712] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 146756] [nf = 207640] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 376780] [nf = 571360] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 668244] [nf = 935080] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 1652364] [nf = 2489448] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 13 secs [nr = 2882244] [nf = 4043816] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7017708] [nf = 10593376] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7174483] [nf = 10763028] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7174603] [nf = 10763036] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7174877] [nf = 10763460] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7175631] [nf = 10763884] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7178953] [nf = 10771864] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7192025] [nf = 10779846] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7265197] [nf = 11031468] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 33 secs [nr = 7629409] [nf = 11283090] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 53 secs [nr = 11832669] [nf = 20947448] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 163 secs [nr = 56083849] [nf = 30611806] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 188764988
% 	resolvents: 74782729	factors: 113982259
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25	
% Total = 25
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 13250660	[3] = 40801065	[4] = 65803962	[5] = 50601405	[6] = 15835296	[7] = 2371280	
% [8] = 101320	
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)5	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)20
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)5	(-)20
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 25
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 337738856
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 188764988
% Number of unification failures: 199158660
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 246647625
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 13306767
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 32
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 10
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 45
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.22
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 387923648
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 629217
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------