TSTP Solution File: GRP129-4.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP129-4.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:25:26 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17041/GRP/GRP129-4.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 108] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 504] [nf = 984] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1560] [nf = 1956] [nu = 72] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12312] [nf = 18864] [nu = 168] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30936] [nf = 35772] [nu = 840] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 194136] [nf = 286152] [nu = 1512] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 449880] [nf = 536532] [nu = 9480] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 2680152] [nf = 3961824] [nu = 17448] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 6020184] [nf = 7387116] [nu = 110664] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7668621] [nf = 9924202] [nu = 117588] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7668729] [nf = 9924214] [nu = 117588] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7669203] [nf = 9925294] [nu = 117588] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7671693] [nf = 9926374] [nu = 117684] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7709852] [nf = 10002016] [nu = 119844] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 46 secs [nr = 11864483] [nf = 10214538] [nu = 1862316] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 198 secs [nr = 41442114] [nf = 51449516] [nu = 5098836] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 122449136
% resolvents: 69569906 factors: 52879230
% Number of unit clauses generated: 18240084
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 14.90
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 16 [4] = 12 [5] = 4 [6] = 28
% Total = 60
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 18240084 [2] = 45791759 [3] = 45613229 [4] = 11865666 [5] = 915250 [6] = 22860
% [7] = 288
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)4 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)4 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)12 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 60
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 213594699
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 122449136
% Number of unification failures: 597918109
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 192
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 105806543
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3826908
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 12354583
% Max entries in substitution set: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 16363628
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 44
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 156
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.28
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 720367245
% ConstructUnitClause() = 16363672
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 17.76 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 408164
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------