TSTP Solution File: GRP129-3.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP129-3.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:23:15 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12318/GRP/GRP129-3.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 61] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 31]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 187] [nf = 10] [nu = 4] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 422] [nf = 316] [nu = 8] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 801] [nf = 622] [nu = 12] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2100] [nf = 2352] [nu = 16] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3975] [nf = 4082] [nu = 20] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10010] [nf = 12036] [nu = 24] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18349] [nf = 19990] [nu = 28] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 44384] [nf = 54352] [nu = 32] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 79635] [nf = 88714] [nu = 36] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 188694] [nf = 233052] [nu = 40] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 334617] [nf = 377390] [nu = 44] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 784460] [nf = 973416] [nu = 48] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1381759] [nf = 1569442] [nu = 52] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 3218306] [nf = 4004116] [nu = 56] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 5644677] [nf = 6438790] [nu = 60] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 57 secs [nr = 13091832] [nf = 16315296] [nu = 64] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 100 secs [nr = 22898283] [nf = 26191802] [nu = 68] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27924562] [nf = 32843781] [nu = 68] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27924688] [nf = 32843791] [nu = 72] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27924959] [nf = 32844121] [nu = 76] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27926127] [nf = 32844611] [nu = 80] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27937401] [nf = 32850251] [nu = 444] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 27959126] [nf = 32856059] [nu = 808] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28051662] [nf = 33015754] [nu = 1172] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 29059709] [nf = 33379123] [nu = 1536] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 155 secs [nr = 39656690] [nf = 39264755] [nu = 1900] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 166633462
% resolvents: 96889832 factors: 69743630
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1900
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 31 [2] = 1 [5] = 3
% Total = 35
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1900 [2] = 38992047 [3] = 28164262 [4] = 25609361 [5] = 45468340 [6] = 24217460
% [7] = 4180092
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [2] equalish_2 (+)1 (-)12
% [3] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [5] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)20 (-)15
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 35
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 315884049
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 3536254
% Number of successful unifications: 166633462
% Number of unification failures: 218850868
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 15
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 300440460
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 63743955
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 40
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 364
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 25
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 66
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.38
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 385484330
% ConstructUnitClause() = 368
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 555445
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------