TSTP Solution File: GRP129-2.005 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GRP129-2.005 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.02s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP129-2.005 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 07:30:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Mon Jun 13 07:30:37 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3820.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_1).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_1).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_2).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_3).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_1).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_2).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_3).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_4).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.18/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.18/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 51
% 0.18/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.18/0.39 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.18/0.39 distinct function count: 0
% 0.18/0.39 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Changing weight limit from 60 to 36.
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 3 [ 1 0 224 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 4 [ 4 0 295 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 5 [ 3 1 22453 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 6 [ 4 0 330 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 7 [ 4 1 382 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 8 [ 5 3 82783 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 9 [ 6 1 366 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Model 10 [ 4 0 413 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.37/13.61
% 13.37/13.61 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 115 givens.
% 13.37/13.61
% 300.02/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------