TSTP Solution File: GRP129-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP129-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:22:57 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21445/GRP/GRP129-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 234] [nf = 8] [nu = 12] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 560] [nf = 490] [nu = 24] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1146] [nf = 972] [nu = 36] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3236] [nf = 3786] [nu = 48] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6318] [nf = 6600] [nu = 60] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16192] [nf = 19658] [nu = 72] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30034] [nf = 32716] [nu = 84] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72876] [nf = 89378] [nu = 96] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 131590] [nf = 146040] [nu = 108] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 311560] [nf = 384682] [nu = 120] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 555018] [nf = 623324] [nu = 132] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1298628] [nf = 1610498] [nu = 144] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 2296190] [nf = 2597672] [nu = 156] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 5335584] [nf = 6635050] [nu = 168] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 41 secs [nr = 9390786] [nf = 10672428] [nu = 180] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 95 secs [nr = 21725468] [nf = 27064770] [nu = 192] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28107275] [nf = 33250086] [nu = 192] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28107441] [nf = 33250094] [nu = 204] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28107778] [nf = 33250600] [nu = 216] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28108757] [nf = 33251106] [nu = 228] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28112874] [nf = 33259690] [nu = 240] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28128949] [nf = 33268276] [nu = 252] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28221439] [nf = 33517168] [nu = 264] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 127 secs [nr = 29056009] [nf = 33766060] [nu = 276] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 162 secs [nr = 40691629] [nf = 44786415] [nu = 288] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 135030869
% resolvents: 82049960 factors: 52980909
% Number of unit clauses generated: 230868
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.17
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 39 [2] = 6
% Total = 45
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 230868 [2] = 48329000 [3] = 46008179 [4] = 25928864 [5] = 9794276 [6] = 3723697
% [7] = 945127 [8] = 70858
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)6
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)26
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 45
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 340934576
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1428461
% Number of successful unifications: 135030869
% Number of unification failures: 414057546
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 279293708
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 26570938
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 230598
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 27
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 91
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.30
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 549088415
% ConstructUnitClause() = 230604
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.29 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 450103
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------