TSTP Solution File: GRP129-1.005 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP129-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:22:41 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8905/GRP/GRP129-1.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 180] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 444] [nf = 488] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 948] [nf = 968] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2908] [nf = 3736] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5828] [nf = 6504] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 15372] [nf = 19304] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 28756] [nf = 32104] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 70396] [nf = 87552] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 127396] [nf = 143000] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 302460] [nf = 376280] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 538964] [nf = 609560] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 1262204] [nf = 1573808] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 2231204] [nf = 2538056] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 22 secs [nr = 5186428] [nf = 6479336] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7657296] [nf = 8871721] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7657416] [nf = 8871729] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7657690] [nf = 8872233] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7658524] [nf = 8872737] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7662246] [nf = 8880797] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7676358] [nf = 8888859] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7753770] [nf = 9120081] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 33 secs [nr = 8118142] [nf = 9351303] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 52 secs [nr = 12266362] [nf = 18115461] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 159 secs [nr = 55829222] [nf = 26879619] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 185081309
% 	resolvents: 74685994	factors: 110395315
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25	
% Total = 25
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 11655613	[3] = 33331998	[4] = 65668516	[5] = 55418857	[6] = 16512905	[7] = 2391620	
% [8] = 101800	
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)5	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)20
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)5	(-)20
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 25
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 336964890
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 185081309
% Number of unification failures: 207100559
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 238972588
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 14939865
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 32
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 10
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 45
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.22
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 392181868
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 616938
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------