TSTP Solution File: GRP129-1.003 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP129-1.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:22:32 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9008/GRP/GRP129-1.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 54] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 150] [nf = 180] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 318] [nf = 352] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 990] [nf = 1300] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1950] [nf = 2248] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5166] [nf = 6564] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 9534] [nf = 10880] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 23454] [nf = 29424] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 41982] [nf = 47968] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 100230] [nf = 125596] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 176910] [nf = 203224] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 416814] [nf = 523080] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 730446] [nf = 842936] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 1708758] [nf = 2147652] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 2981982] [nf = 3452368] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 28 secs [nr = 6945822] [nf = 8740144] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7734354] [nf = 9526798] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7734390] [nf = 9526806] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7734502] [nf = 9527002] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7734812] [nf = 9527200] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7737056] [nf = 9530514] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7750184] [nf = 9533828] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7937732] [nf = 9683930] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 35 secs [nr = 9451532] [nf = 9834032] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 86 secs [nr = 27770648] [nf = 24329334] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 162665833
% 	resolvents: 126917225	factors: 35748608
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9		
% Total = 9
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 15242357	[3] = 61074898	[4] = 59698855	[5] = 23377458	[6] = 3272265	
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)6
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)3	(-)6
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 9
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 483347230
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 162665833
% Number of unification failures: 318620844
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 94728978
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 19136630
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 8
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 15
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.53
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 481286677
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 542219
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------