TSTP Solution File: GRP128-3.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP128-3.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:18:10 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4702/GRP/GRP128-3.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 61] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 31]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 187] [nf = 10] [nu = 4] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 422] [nf = 292] [nu = 8] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 861] [nf = 574] [nu = 60] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2172] [nf = 2328] [nu = 112] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4203] [nf = 4082] [nu = 260] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10586] [nf = 12060] [nu = 408] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19753] [nf = 20038] [nu = 940] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46808] [nf = 54400] [nu = 1472] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84999] [nf = 88762] [nu = 3540] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 197718] [nf = 233700] [nu = 5608] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 354981] [nf = 378638] [nu = 13820] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 820436] [nf = 981000] [nu = 22032] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1464067] [nf = 1583362] [nu = 54820] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 3370706] [nf = 4060780] [nu = 87608] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 26 secs [nr = 5990049] [nf = 6538198] [nu = 218700] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 59 secs [nr = 13752144] [nf = 16651920] [nu = 349792] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 104 secs [nr = 24365055] [nf = 26765642] [nu = 874100] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28587145] [nf = 32213093] [nu = 950924] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28587283] [nf = 32213103] [nu = 950928] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28587566] [nf = 32213409] [nu = 950932] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28588818] [nf = 32213875] [nu = 950984] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28600308] [nf = 32220031] [nu = 951396] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28625513] [nf = 32226607] [nu = 951904] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28785690] [nf = 32405616] [nu = 952412] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 30943357] [nf = 33130747] [nu = 953304] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 104033234
% resolvents: 63882230 factors: 40151004
% Number of unit clauses generated: 954196
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.92
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 31 [2] = 1 [4] = 12 [5] = 3
% Total = 47
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 954196 [2] = 38600651 [3] = 37888115 [4] = 18200150 [5] = 7065454 [6] = 1239763
% [7] = 84905
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [2] equalish_2 (+)1 (-)12
% [3] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [5] product_3 (+)0 (-)12
% ------------------
% Total: (+)20 (-)27
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 47
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 319136416
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 744346
% Number of successful unifications: 104033234
% Number of unification failures: 659881828
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 15
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 243002960
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 42846798
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 31670260
% Max entries in substitution set: 40
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 525184
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 42
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 102
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.41
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 763915062
% ConstructUnitClause() = 525200
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.51 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 346777
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------