TSTP Solution File: GRP128-2.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP128-2.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:19:29 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16501/GRP/GRP128-2.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 141] [nf = 8] [nu = 6] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 347] [nf = 290] [nu = 12] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 769] [nf = 572] [nu = 66] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2087] [nf = 2366] [nu = 120] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4149] [nf = 4160] [nu = 270] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10675] [nf = 12358] [nu = 420] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20081] [nf = 20556] [nu = 954] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47863] [nf = 55954] [nu = 1488] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87165] [nf = 91352] [nu = 3558] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 203139] [nf = 240870] [nu = 5628] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 365193] [nf = 390388] [nu = 13842] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 844575] [nf = 1012346] [nu = 22056] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1508277] [nf = 1634304] [nu = 54846] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 3473211] [nf = 4193902] [nu = 87636] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 26 secs [nr = 6175425] [nf = 6753500] [nu = 218730] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 61 secs [nr = 14178327] [nf = 17207298] [nu = 349824] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 108 secs [nr = 25130349] [nf = 27661096] [nu = 874134] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28594365] [nf = 32120297] [nu = 937590] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28594476] [nf = 32120305] [nu = 937596] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28594705] [nf = 32120611] [nu = 937602] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28595401] [nf = 32120917] [nu = 937656] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28598410] [nf = 32127049] [nu = 937710] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28614997] [nf = 32133709] [nu = 937860] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 28830214] [nf = 32314249] [nu = 938010] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 132 secs [nr = 31836872] [nf = 33284719] [nu = 938544] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 100702913
% resolvents: 61322473 factors: 39380440
% Number of unit clauses generated: 6760058
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 6.71
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25 [2] = 3 [4] = 12 [9] = 47
% Total = 87
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 6760058 [2] = 49301181 [3] = 32045866 [4] = 8594582 [5] = 3347259 [6] = 609238
% [7] = 44729
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)4 (-)12
% [2] greater_2 (+)6 (-)3
% [3] next_2 (+)3 (-)6
% [4] product_3 (+)7 (-)42
% ------------------
% Total: (+)24 (-)63
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 87
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 203404940
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 546913
% Number of successful unifications: 100702913
% Number of unification failures: 736630318
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 378
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 242077942
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 22830296
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 10442565
% Max entries in substitution set: 40
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6315988
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 63
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 219
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 43
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 837333231
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6316050
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 6.99 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 335676
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------