TSTP Solution File: GRP128-1.004 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP128-1.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:17:25 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5919/GRP/GRP128-1.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 108] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 276] [nf = 288] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 648] [nf = 568] [nu = 48] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1884] [nf = 2320] [nu = 96] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3840] [nf = 4072] [nu = 240] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10116] [nf = 12048] [nu = 384] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 19176] [nf = 20024] [nu = 912] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 45996] [nf = 54384] [nu = 1440] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 83952] [nf = 88744] [nu = 3504] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 195924] [nf = 233680] [nu = 5568] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 352440] [nf = 378616] [nu = 13776] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 815100] [nf = 980976] [nu = 21984] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 1455936] [nf = 1583336] [nu = 54768] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 13 secs [nr = 3351588] [nf = 4060752] [nu = 87552] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 24 secs [nr = 5959944] [nf = 6538168] [nu = 218640] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7884773] [nf = 9023955] [nu = 255408] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7884857] [nf = 9023963] [nu = 255408] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7885047] [nf = 9024267] [nu = 255408] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7885653] [nf = 9024571] [nu = 255456] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7888325] [nf = 9030369] [nu = 255504] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 7902013] [nf = 9036579] [nu = 255648] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 8042393] [nf = 9205597] [nu = 255792] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 37 secs [nr = 10044417] [nf = 9916791] [nu = 256320] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 203 secs [nr = 42871601] [nf = 16541841] [nu = 256848] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 114604655
% 	resolvents: 79103031	factors: 35501624
% Number of unit clauses generated: 258912
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.23
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 16	[4] = 12	
% Total = 28
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 258912	[2] = 11212455	[3] = 27462823	[4] = 37017756	[5] = 26023658	[6] = 10775180	
% [7] = 1853871	
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)4	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)12
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)12
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)4	(-)24
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 28
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 240857436
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 114604655
% Number of unification failures: 716918662
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 122362775
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 11281580
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 34379326
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 133140
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 26
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 64
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.41
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 831523317
% ConstructUnitClause() = 133152
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.17 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 382016
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------