TSTP Solution File: GRP128-1.003 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP128-1.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:17:19 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8570/GRP/GRP128-1.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 54] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 150] [nf = 168] [nu = 0] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 348] [nf = 328] [nu = 24] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1026] [nf = 1288] [nu = 48] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2064] [nf = 2248] [nu = 120] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5454] [nf = 6576] [nu = 192] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10236] [nf = 10904] [nu = 456] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24666] [nf = 29448] [nu = 720] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 44664] [nf = 47992] [nu = 1752] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 104742] [nf = 125920] [nu = 2784] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 187092] [nf = 203848] [nu = 6888] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 434802] [nf = 526872] [nu = 10992] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 771600] [nf = 849896] [nu = 27384] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 1784958] [nf = 2175984] [nu = 43776] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 13 secs [nr = 3154668] [nf = 3502072] [nu = 109320] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 29 secs [nr = 7275978] [nf = 8908456] [nu = 174864] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7887758] [nf = 9465318] [nu = 207612] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7887800] [nf = 9465326] [nu = 207612] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7887918] [nf = 9465510] [nu = 207612] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7888312] [nf = 9465696] [nu = 207636] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7891240] [nf = 9469334] [nu = 207660] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 7920112] [nf = 9472972] [nu = 207732] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 33 secs [nr = 8273008] [nf = 9684280] [nu = 207804] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 288 secs [nr = 108022627] [nf = 11164420] [nu = 7652493] [ut = 57]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 130895935
% 	resolvents: 110226397	factors: 20669538
% Number of unit clauses generated: 7654797
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 5.85
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9		[4] = 6		[8] = 42	
% Total = 57
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 7654797	[2] = 72752117	[3] = 37784323	[4] = 10504038	[5] = 2080320	[6] = 120340	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)6
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)48
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)3	(-)54
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 57
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 395507414
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 130895935
% Number of unification failures: 559089245
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 83758866
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 7209975
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 10
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6157409
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 28
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 159
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.18
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 689985180
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6157457
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 6.89 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 436320
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------