TSTP Solution File: GRP127-4.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP127-4.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:16:51 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3990/GRP/GRP127-4.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 294] [nf = 12] [nu = 162] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1020] [nf = 1020] [nu = 348] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8118] [nf = 2028] [nu = 4662] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35520] [nf = 39420] [nu = 8976] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 257610] [nf = 76812] [nu = 136242] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1158228] [nf = 1253340] [nu = 263508] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 8008926] [nf = 2429868] [nu = 4154334] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10192794] [nf = 5245838] [nu = 4496600] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10193178] [nf = 5245850] [nu = 4496786] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10193946] [nf = 5246966] [nu = 4496972] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10216236] [nf = 5248082] [nu = 4508666] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10332883] [nf = 5434976] [nu = 4524968] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 91 secs [nr = 28545690] [nf = 5762982] [nu = 16190318] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 172039042
% resolvents: 86108658 factors: 85930384
% Number of unit clauses generated: 25965194
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 15.09
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 17 [2] = 37 [5] = 4 [6] = 4
% Total = 62
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 25965194 [2] = 67479216 [3] = 65619676 [4] = 12234001 [5] = 726207 [6] = 14556
% [7] = 192
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)5 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 62
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 141322446
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 172039042
% Number of unification failures: 301378800
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 166182527
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 5279520
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 2291030
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15823707
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 47
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 161
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 473417842
% ConstructUnitClause() = 15823752
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 16.36 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 573463
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------