TSTP Solution File: GRP127-2.006 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP127-2.006 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s 300.22s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : GRP127-2.006 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 22:55:23 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.35  Mon Jun 13 22:55:23 2022
% 0.11/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11912.
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_1).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_1).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_2).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_3).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_1).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_2).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_3).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_5,e_4).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_6,e_1).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_6,e_2).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_6,e_3).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_6,e_4).
% 0.11/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_6,e_5).
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.35  
% 0.11/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.11/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.11/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.11/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 25
% 0.11/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 52
% 0.11/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 48
% 0.11/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.11/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.11/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.11/0.37     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.11/0.37     distinct function count: 0
% 0.11/0.37     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Changing weight limit from 60 to 40.
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Model 2 [ 3 1 14555 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Model 3 [ 4 8 241091 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Model 4 [ 5 1 11813 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.46/11.64  
% 11.46/11.64  Resetting weight limit to 40 after 95 givens.
% 11.46/11.64  
% 173.03/173.26  
% 173.03/173.26  
% 173.03/173.26  Changing weight limit from 40 to 36.
% 173.03/173.26  
% 173.03/173.26  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 220 givens.
% 173.03/173.26  
% 228.54/228.73  
% 228.54/228.73  
% 228.54/228.73  Changing weight limit from 36 to 32.
% 228.54/228.73  
% 228.54/228.73  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 235 givens.
% 228.54/228.73  
% 300.05/300.22  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------