TSTP Solution File: GRP127-2.006 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP127-2.006 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:12:51 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4264/GRP/GRP127-2.006+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 117] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 57]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 749] [nf = 8] [nu = 396] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1709] [nf = 722] [nu = 792] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6382] [nf = 1436] [nu = 3596] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15124] [nf = 8486] [nu = 6400] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 59124] [nf = 15536] [nu = 31272] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 142954] [nf = 80666] [nu = 56144] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 560870] [nf = 145796] [nu = 290680] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1352188] [nf = 739070] [nu = 525216] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 5362864] [nf = 1332344] [nu = 2781348] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 38 secs [nr = 12911778] [nf = 6907618] [nu = 5037480] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42024162] [nf = 10634996] [nu = 21875645] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42024890] [nf = 10635004] [nu = 21876041] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42025861] [nf = 10635742] [nu = 21876437] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42037999] [nf = 10636480] [nu = 21882979] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42063506] [nf = 10663468] [nu = 21889521] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 42659627] [nf = 10690456] [nu = 22176759] [ut = 155]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 131 secs [nr = 44368012] [nf = 12586480] [nu = 22568793] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 98230133
% resolvents: 85070008 factors: 13160125
% Number of unit clauses generated: 49014701
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 49.90
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 57 [2] = 98 [7] = 7
% [8] = 8
% Total = 170
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 49014701 [2] = 37172550 [3] = 11422176 [4] = 586211 [5] = 33588 [6] = 782
% [7] = 125
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)7 (-)30
% [2] greater_2 (+)15 (-)1
% [3] next_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)8 (-)98
% ------------------
% Total: (+)41 (-)129
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 170
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 151868662
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 98230133
% Number of unification failures: 514559897
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1009
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 95635300
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 7293280
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 55
% Max entries in substitution set: 29
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 43939119
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 92
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 440
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.21
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 612790030
% ConstructUnitClause() = 43939232
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 47.76 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 327434
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------