TSTP Solution File: GRP127-1.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP127-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:12:28 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11622/GRP/GRP127-1.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 26]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 454] [nf = 8] [nu = 254] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1052] [nf = 500] [nu = 508] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4134] [nf = 992] [nu = 2386] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9960] [nf = 5812] [nu = 4264] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39570] [nf = 10632] [nu = 21078] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96236] [nf = 55164] [nu = 37892] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 378558] [nf = 99696] [nu = 196690] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 915264] [nf = 506356] [nu = 355488] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 3627674] [nf = 913016] [nu = 1884022] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 8754740] [nf = 4741668] [nu = 3412556] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 96 secs [nr = 35110542] [nf = 8570320] [nu = 18323994] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 44376190] [nf = 15462362] [nu = 21211760] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 44376638] [nf = 15462370] [nu = 21212014] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 44377246] [nf = 15462886] [nu = 21212268] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 44385264] [nf = 15463402] [nu = 21216654] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 44402278] [nf = 15481954] [nu = 21221040] [ut = 87]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 44901764] [nf = 15502268] [nu = 21474392] [ut = 97]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 138 secs [nr = 49587160] [nf = 19333778] [nu = 22969404] [ut = 97]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 115536133
% resolvents: 95597170 factors: 19938963
% Number of unit clauses generated: 52780038
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 45.68
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 26 [2] = 61 [6] = 10
% Total = 97
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 52780038 [2] = 44959790 [3] = 16853421 [4] = 878472 [5] = 55904 [6] = 7908
% [7] = 560 [8] = 40
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)6 (-)20
% [2] product_3 (+)6 (-)60
% ------------------
% Total: (+)17 (-)80
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 97
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 128953999
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 115536133
% Number of unification failures: 449160791
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 480
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 110944576
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 8374575
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 47414
% Max entries in substitution set: 32
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 44699367
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 61
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 255
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.24
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 564696924
% ConstructUnitClause() = 44699438
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 48.42 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 385120
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------