TSTP Solution File: GRP126-4.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP126-4.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:11:46 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20680/GRP/GRP126-4.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 294] [nf = 12] [nu = 162] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1020] [nf = 972] [nu = 348] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8262] [nf = 1932] [nu = 4806] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35520] [nf = 38940] [nu = 9264] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 260586] [nf = 75948] [nu = 138282] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1171236] [nf = 1259964] [nu = 267300] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 8023470] [nf = 2443980] [nu = 4123854] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10219530] [nf = 5172318] [nu = 4465086] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10219914] [nf = 5172330] [nu = 4465272] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10220682] [nf = 5173398] [nu = 4465458] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10242876] [nf = 5174466] [nu = 4476912] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10360003] [nf = 5360232] [nu = 4492974] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 89 secs [nr = 28103898] [nf = 5684126] [nu = 15723060] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 171850471
% resolvents: 86588574 factors: 85261897
% Number of unit clauses generated: 25345170
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 14.75
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 17 [2] = 37 [5] = 4 [6] = 4
% Total = 62
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 25345170 [2] = 66138718 [3] = 66850389 [4] = 12753338 [5] = 747820 [6] = 14844
% [7] = 192
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)5 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 62
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 142987786
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 171850471
% Number of unification failures: 307730041
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 169429169
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 5335629
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 2280838
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15347403
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 47
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 161
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 479580512
% ConstructUnitClause() = 15347448
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 16.71 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 572835
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------