TSTP Solution File: GRP126-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP126-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:08:54 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2016/GRP/GRP126-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 81] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 513] [nf = 8] [nu = 268] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1214] [nf = 562] [nu = 576] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5257] [nf = 1116] [nu = 3100] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12654] [nf = 8750] [nu = 5624] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 50423] [nf = 16384] [nu = 27580] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 124836] [nf = 100930] [nu = 49536] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 472097] [nf = 185476] [nu = 245824] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1177950] [nf = 1043054] [nu = 442112] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 4425103] [nf = 1900632] [nu = 2273432] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 11114808] [nf = 9947818] [nu = 4104752] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39515678] [nf = 16632560] [nu = 20378793] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39516213] [nf = 16632568] [nu = 20379101] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39516925] [nf = 16633146] [nu = 20379409] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39525945] [nf = 16633724] [nu = 20384207] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39545203] [nf = 16659958] [nu = 20389005] [ut = 105]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 40067039] [nf = 16689230] [nu = 20640375] [ut = 117]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 142 secs [nr = 45026469] [nf = 21892902] [nu = 22078679] [ut = 117]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 109360269
% resolvents: 86662785 factors: 22697484
% Number of unit clauses generated: 48369935
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 44.23
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 40 [2] = 65 [6] = 12
% Total = 117
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 48369935 [2] = 45156610 [3] = 14734553 [4] = 1028969 [5] = 61230 [6] = 8317
% [7] = 610 [8] = 45
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)6 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)1
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)7 (-)64
% ------------------
% Total: (+)32 (-)85
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 117
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 169494781
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 126022
% Number of successful unifications: 109360269
% Number of unification failures: 466955400
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 578
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 118699351
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 6964209
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 71264
% Max entries in substitution set: 30
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 42749108
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 74
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 300
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.25
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 576315669
% ConstructUnitClause() = 42749185
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 45.86 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 364534
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------