TSTP Solution File: GRP125-4.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP125-4.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:08:55 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14930/GRP/GRP125-4.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 294] [nf = 12] [nu = 162] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1068] [nf = 780] [nu = 396] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9942] [nf = 1548] [nu = 5958] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40848] [nf = 50268] [nu = 11520] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 302010] [nf = 98988] [nu = 162666] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1388724] [nf = 1739772] [nu = 313812] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 29 secs [nr = 9178494] [nf = 3380556] [nu = 4683150] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 9936172] [nf = 4462772] [nu = 4793432] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 9936604] [nf = 4462784] [nu = 4793666] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 9937420] [nf = 4463660] [nu = 4793900] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 9961030] [nf = 4464536] [nu = 4806266] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10081541] [nf = 4684046] [nu = 4823336] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 90 secs [nr = 27975748] [nf = 5055076] [nu = 16114622] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 167705256
% resolvents: 81271021 factors: 86434235
% Number of unit clauses generated: 24717980
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 14.74
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 17 [2] = 37 [5] = 4 [6] = 4
% Total = 62
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 24717980 [2] = 67407397 [3] = 63066610 [4] = 11814786 [5] = 685397 [6] = 12918
% [7] = 168
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)5 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 62
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 141307381
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 167705256
% Number of unification failures: 267039410
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 155677971
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 4675419
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1154592
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15777147
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 47
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 161
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 434744666
% ConstructUnitClause() = 15777192
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 17.03 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 559018
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------