TSTP Solution File: GRP125-1.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP125-1.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:03:42 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1597/GRP/GRP125-1.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 286] [nf = 8] [nu = 158] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 692] [nf = 252] [nu = 340] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3110] [nf = 496] [nu = 1874] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7376] [nf = 4948] [nu = 3408] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30058] [nf = 9400] [nu = 16878] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74820] [nf = 58716] [nu = 30348] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 286990] [nf = 108032] [nu = 151274] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 716408] [nf = 614820] [nu = 272200] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2708162] [nf = 1121608] [nu = 1402790] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 6798668] [nf = 5907820] [nu = 2533380] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10277193] [nf = 6585044] [nu = 4575748] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10277497] [nf = 6585052] [nu = 4575930] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10277913] [nf = 6585320] [nu = 4576112] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10283307] [nf = 6585588] [nu = 4579050] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10298649] [nf = 6603326] [nu = 4583620] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 11791135] [nf = 6633320] [nu = 5517862] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 60 secs [nr = 16551953] [nf = 9852330] [nu = 7005064] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 103044758
% resolvents: 92009235 factors: 11035523
% Number of unit clauses generated: 54537205
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 52.93
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 17 [2] = 37 [5] = 4 [6] = 4
% Total = 62
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 54537205 [2] = 36008975 [3] = 11317702 [4] = 1105675 [5] = 72326 [6] = 2811
% [7] = 64
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)5 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 62
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 138794573
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 103044758
% Number of unification failures: 535189605
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 43045611
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2649376
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 3575681
% Max entries in substitution set: 29
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 51653025
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 47
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 161
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 638234363
% ConstructUnitClause() = 51653070
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 55.56 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 343483
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------