TSTP Solution File: GRP124-9.004 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GRP124-9.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:17:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP124-9.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 11:46:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/0.99  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/0.99  Process 16537 was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/0.99  Mon Jun 13 11:46:53 2022
% 0.71/0.99  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_16383_n015.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_16383_n015.cluster.edu
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/0.99  set(auto2).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/0.99      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/0.99      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.99  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/0.99  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/0.99  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/0.99  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (29 formulas)
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/0.99  
% 0.71/0.99  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/0.99  1 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(A,B,D) | equalish(C,D) # label(product1_total_function2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  2 -equalish(e_1,e_2) # label(e_1_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  3 -equalish(e_1,e_3) # label(e_1_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  4 -equalish(e_1,e_4) # label(e_1_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  5 -equalish(e_2,e_1) # label(e_2_is_not_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  6 -equalish(e_2,e_3) # label(e_2_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  7 -equalish(e_2,e_4) # label(e_2_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  8 -equalish(e_3,e_1) # label(e_3_is_not_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  9 -equalish(e_3,e_2) # label(e_3_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  10 -equalish(e_3,e_4) # label(e_3_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  11 -equalish(e_4,e_1) # label(e_4_is_not_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  12 -equalish(e_4,e_2) # label(e_4_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  13 -equalish(e_4,e_3) # label(e_4_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_1) | -product1(A,B,e_2).  [resolve(1,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_1) | -product1(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(1,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_1) | -product1(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(1,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_2) | -product1(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(1,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_2) | -product1(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(1,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,B,e_3) | -product1(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(1,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  14 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(A,D,C) | equalish(B,D) # label(product1_right_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_2,B).  [resolve(14,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(14,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/0.99  Derived: -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(A,e_2,B) | -product1(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(14,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(A,e_2,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(A,e_3,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  15 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(D,B,C) | equalish(A,D) # label(product1_left_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_2,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_2,A,B) | -product1(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_2,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product1(e_3,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  16 -product2(A,B,C) | -product2(A,B,D) | equalish(C,D) # label(product2_total_function2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_1) | -product2(A,B,e_2).  [resolve(16,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_1) | -product2(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(16,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_1) | -product2(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(16,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_2) | -product2(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(16,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_2) | -product2(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(16,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,B,e_3) | -product2(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(16,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  17 -product2(A,B,C) | -product2(A,D,C) | equalish(B,D) # label(product2_right_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_1,B) | -product2(A,e_2,B).  [resolve(17,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_1,B) | -product2(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(17,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_1,B) | -product2(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(17,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_2,B) | -product2(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(17,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_2,B) | -product2(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(17,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(A,e_3,B) | -product2(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(17,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  18 -product2(A,B,C) | -product2(D,B,C) | equalish(A,D) # label(product2_left_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_1,A,B) | -product2(e_2,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_1,A,B) | -product2(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_1,A,B) | -product2(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_2,A,B) | -product2(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_2,A,B) | -product2(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  Derived: -product2(e_3,A,B) | -product2(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(18,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/1.02  Function symbol KB weights:  e_1=1. e_2=1. e_3=1. e_4=1.
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  % Proof 1 at 0.04 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.71/1.02  % Length of proof is 78.
% 0.71/1.02  % Level of proof is 12.
% 0.71/1.02  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.71/1.02  % Given clauses 310.
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  2 -equalish(e_1,e_2) # label(e_1_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  3 -equalish(e_1,e_3) # label(e_1_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  4 -equalish(e_1,e_4) # label(e_1_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  6 -equalish(e_2,e_3) # label(e_2_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  7 -equalish(e_2,e_4) # label(e_2_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  10 -equalish(e_3,e_4) # label(e_3_is_not_e_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  14 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(A,D,C) | equalish(B,D) # label(product1_right_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  15 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(D,B,C) | equalish(A,D) # label(product1_left_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  16 -product2(A,B,C) | -product2(A,B,D) | equalish(C,D) # label(product2_total_function2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  19 group_element(e_1) # label(element_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  20 group_element(e_2) # label(element_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  21 group_element(e_3) # label(element_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  22 group_element(e_4) # label(element_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  23 product1(A,A,A) # label(product1_idempotence) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  24 product2(A,A,A) # label(product2_idempotence) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  25 -product1(A,B,C) | -product1(C,A,D) | product2(D,B,A) # label(qg2a) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  28 -group_element(A) | -group_element(B) | product1(A,B,e_1) | product1(A,B,e_2) | product1(A,B,e_3) | product1(A,B,e_4) # label(product1_total_function1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.71/1.02  36 -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_2,B).  [resolve(14,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  37 -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(14,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  38 -product1(A,e_1,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  39 -product1(A,e_2,B) | -product1(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(14,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  40 -product1(A,e_2,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  41 -product1(A,e_3,B) | -product1(A,e_4,B).  [resolve(14,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  42 -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_2,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,2,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  43 -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  44 -product1(e_1,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  45 -product1(e_2,A,B) | -product1(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  46 -product1(e_2,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,7,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  47 -product1(e_3,A,B) | -product1(e_4,A,B).  [resolve(15,c,10,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  49 -product2(A,B,e_1) | -product2(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(16,c,3,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  50 -product2(A,B,e_1) | -product2(A,B,e_4).  [resolve(16,c,4,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  88 -group_element(A) | product1(e_4,A,e_1) | product1(e_4,A,e_2) | product1(e_4,A,e_3) | product1(e_4,A,e_4).  [resolve(28,a,22,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  89 -group_element(A) | product1(e_3,A,e_1) | product1(e_3,A,e_2) | product1(e_3,A,e_3) | product1(e_3,A,e_4).  [resolve(28,a,21,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  90 -group_element(A) | product1(e_2,A,e_1) | product1(e_2,A,e_2) | product1(e_2,A,e_3) | product1(e_2,A,e_4).  [resolve(28,a,20,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  116 -product1(e_2,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(36,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  118 -product1(e_3,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(37,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  120 -product1(e_4,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(38,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  122 -product1(e_3,e_2,e_3).  [resolve(39,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  124 -product1(e_4,e_2,e_4).  [resolve(40,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  126 -product1(e_4,e_3,e_4).  [resolve(41,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  127 -product1(e_3,e_4,e_3).  [ur(41,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  129 -product1(e_2,e_1,e_1).  [ur(42,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  131 -product1(e_3,e_1,e_1).  [ur(43,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  133 -product1(e_4,e_1,e_1).  [ur(44,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  135 -product1(e_3,e_2,e_2).  [ur(45,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  137 -product1(e_4,e_2,e_2).  [ur(46,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  138 -product1(e_3,e_4,e_4).  [resolve(47,b,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  139 -product1(e_4,e_3,e_3).  [ur(47,a,23,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  143 -product2(e_1,e_1,e_3).  [ur(49,a,24,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  145 -product2(e_1,e_1,e_4).  [ur(50,a,24,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  208 product1(e_4,e_3,e_1) | product1(e_4,e_3,e_2).  [resolve(88,a,21,a),unit_del(c,139),unit_del(d,126)].
% 0.71/1.02  209 product1(e_4,e_2,e_1) | product1(e_4,e_2,e_3).  [resolve(88,a,20,a),unit_del(b,137),unit_del(d,124)].
% 0.71/1.02  210 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_4,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(88,a,19,a),unit_del(a,133),unit_del(d,120)].
% 0.71/1.02  212 product1(e_4,e_3,e_1) | -product1(e_4,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(208,b,37,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  216 product1(e_4,e_2,e_1) | -product1(e_4,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(209,b,36,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  219 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2) | -product1(e_2,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(210,b,46,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  221 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2) | -product1(e_3,e_4,A) | product2(A,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(210,b,25,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  222 product1(e_3,e_4,e_1) | product1(e_3,e_4,e_2).  [resolve(89,a,22,a),unit_del(c,127),unit_del(d,138)].
% 0.71/1.02  223 product1(e_3,e_2,e_1) | product1(e_3,e_2,e_4).  [resolve(89,a,20,a),unit_del(b,135),unit_del(c,122)].
% 0.71/1.02  224 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_3,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(89,a,19,a),unit_del(a,131),unit_del(c,118)].
% 0.71/1.02  225 product1(e_4,e_2,e_1) | product1(e_4,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(216,b,210,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  228 product1(e_2,e_1,e_3) | product1(e_2,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(90,a,19,a),unit_del(a,129),unit_del(b,116)].
% 0.71/1.02  230 product1(e_3,e_4,e_1) | -product1(e_3,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(222,b,38,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  234 product1(e_3,e_2,e_1) | -product1(e_3,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(223,b,36,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  237 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | -product1(e_2,e_1,e_4).  [resolve(224,b,45,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  239 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | -product1(e_4,e_3,A) | product2(A,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(224,b,25,a)].
% 0.71/1.02  240 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2) | -product1(e_3,e_2,e_1).  [resolve(225,a,47,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  256 product1(e_3,e_2,e_1) | product1(e_3,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(234,b,224,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  257 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_2,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(237,b,228,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  270 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_4,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(256,a,240,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  273 product1(e_2,e_1,e_3) | product1(e_3,e_4,e_1).  [resolve(257,a,230,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  293 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_4,e_3,e_1).  [resolve(270,b,212,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  375 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2) | product1(e_2,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(221,b,273,b),unit_del(b,145)].
% 0.71/1.02  417 product1(e_2,e_1,e_3) | -product1(e_3,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(375,a,47,b)].
% 0.71/1.02  433 product1(e_3,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(239,b,293,b),merge(c),unit_del(b,143)].
% 0.71/1.02  434 product1(e_2,e_1,e_3).  [back_unit_del(417),unit_del(b,433)].
% 0.71/1.02  440 product1(e_4,e_1,e_2).  [back_unit_del(219),unit_del(b,434)].
% 0.71/1.02  447 $F.  [ur(47,a,433,a),unit_del(a,440)].
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  Given=310. Generated=850. Kept=428. proofs=1.
% 0.71/1.02  Usable=227. Sos=16. Demods=0. Limbo=2, Disabled=248. Hints=0.
% 0.71/1.02  Megabytes=0.28.
% 0.71/1.02  User_CPU=0.04, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/1.02  
% 0.71/1.02  Process 16537 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 13 11:46:53 2022
% 0.71/1.02  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------