TSTP Solution File: GRP124-9.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP124-9.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:02:10 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10813/GRP/GRP124-9.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 568] [nf = 14] [nu = 314] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1184] [nf = 196] [nu = 628] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3120] [nf = 378] [nu = 1782] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5500] [nf = 992] [nu = 2936] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10160] [nf = 1606] [nu = 5386] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14820] [nf = 2220] [nu = 7836] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19480] [nf = 2834] [nu = 10286] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24140] [nf = 3448] [nu = 12736] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28800] [nf = 4062] [nu = 15186] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33460] [nf = 4676] [nu = 17636] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38120] [nf = 5290] [nu = 20086] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42780] [nf = 5904] [nu = 22536] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 47440] [nf = 6518] [nu = 24986] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52100] [nf = 7132] [nu = 27436] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 56760] [nf = 7746] [nu = 29886] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 61420] [nf = 8360] [nu = 32336] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66080] [nf = 8974] [nu = 34786] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 70740] [nf = 9588] [nu = 37236] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 75400] [nf = 10202] [nu = 39686] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 80060] [nf = 10816] [nu = 42136] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84720] [nf = 11430] [nu = 44586] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 89380] [nf = 12044] [nu = 47036] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 94040] [nf = 12658] [nu = 49486] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 98700] [nf = 13272] [nu = 51936] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 103360] [nf = 13886] [nu = 54386] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 108020] [nf = 14500] [nu = 56836] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 112680] [nf = 15114] [nu = 59286] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 117340] [nf = 15728] [nu = 61736] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 122000] [nf = 16342] [nu = 64186] [ut = 91]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 122084] [nf = 16342] [nu = 64186] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 122604] [nf = 16356] [nu = 64500] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 123226] [nf = 16538] [nu = 64814] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 126498] [nf = 16720] [nu = 66724] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 135530] [nf = 18886] [nu = 70650] [ut = 99]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 327728] [nf = 22204] [nu = 171040] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1300952] [nf = 25522] [nu = 541190] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 7158308] [nf = 1458144] [n
% u = 911340] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 56119281
% resolvents: 54126007 factors: 1993274
% Number of unit clauses generated: 12503027
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 22.28
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 18 [2] = 73 [5] = 8 [6] = 4
% Total = 103
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 12503027 [2] = 22959856 [3] = 14620140 [4] = 5053010 [5] = 983248
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product1_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [3] product2_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)84
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 103
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 257593566
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 56119281
% Number of unification failures: 1120815396
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 420
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 10463421
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 8542288
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 42553822
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11784888
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 79
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 284
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.28
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 43
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1176934677
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11784973
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 11.96 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 187064
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------