TSTP Solution File: GRP124-8.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP124-8.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:03:43 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14040/GRP/GRP124-8.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 154] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 974] [nf = 16] [nu = 510] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1998] [nf = 296] [nu = 1020] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5142] [nf = 576] [nu = 2882] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9018] [nf = 1560] [nu = 4744] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16646] [nf = 2544] [nu = 8734] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24274] [nf = 3528] [nu = 12724] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31902] [nf = 4512] [nu = 16714] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39530] [nf = 5496] [nu = 20704] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 47158] [nf = 6480] [nu = 24694] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54786] [nf = 7464] [nu = 28684] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 62414] [nf = 8448] [nu = 32674] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 70042] [nf = 9432] [nu = 36664] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 77670] [nf = 10416] [nu = 40654] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 85298] [nf = 11400] [nu = 44644] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 92926] [nf = 12384] [nu = 48634] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100554] [nf = 13368] [nu = 52624] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 108182] [nf = 14352] [nu = 56614] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 115810] [nf = 15336] [nu = 60604] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 123438] [nf = 16320] [nu = 64594] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 131066] [nf = 17304] [nu = 68584] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 138694] [nf = 18288] [nu = 72574] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 146322] [nf = 19272] [nu = 76564] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 153950] [nf = 20256] [nu = 80554] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 161578] [nf = 21240] [nu = 84544] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 169206] [nf = 22224] [nu = 88534] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 176834] [nf = 23208] [nu = 92524] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 184462] [nf = 24192] [nu = 96514] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 192090] [nf = 25176] [nu = 100504] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 199718] [nf = 26160] [nu = 104494] [ut = 170]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 199872] [nf = 26160] [nu = 104494] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 200752] [nf = 26176] [nu = 105004] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 201782] [nf = 26456] [nu = 105514] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 207142] [nf = 26962] [nu = 108612] [ut = 170]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 227411] [nf = 30180] [nu = 112190] [ut = 174]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 329630] [nf = 33922] [nu = 156300] [ut = 184]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 741677] [nf = 39424] [nu = 313340] [
% ut = 184]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 96 secs [nr = 8814400] [nf = 52142] [nu = 3093100] [ut = 188]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 81197200
% resolvents: 67898520 factors: 13298680
% Number of unit clauses generated: 5722774
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 7.05
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 48 [2] = 122 [5] = 4 [6] = 10 [8] = 4
% Total = 188
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 5722774 [2] = 10130606 [3] = 28904141 [4] = 23511862 [5] = 10523448 [6] = 2404369
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)4
% [2] equalish_2 (+)6 (-)20
% [3] greater_2 (+)15 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [5] product1_3 (+)6 (-)60
% [6] product2_3 (+)6 (-)60
% [7] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)44 (-)144
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 188
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 103219868
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 81197200
% Number of unification failures: 919523410
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 844
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 51304744
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 57344281
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 69736214
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 2668700
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 121
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 503
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.24
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 48
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1000720610
% ConstructUnitClause() = 2668840
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 3.21 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 270657
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------