TSTP Solution File: GRP124-7.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP124-7.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:01:31 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7220/GRP/GRP124-7.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 132] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 904] [nf = 14] [nu = 506] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1880] [nf = 292] [nu = 1012] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4976] [nf = 570] [nu = 2870] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8804] [nf = 1552] [nu = 4728] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16384] [nf = 2534] [nu = 8714] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23964] [nf = 3516] [nu = 12700] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31544] [nf = 4498] [nu = 16686] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39124] [nf = 5480] [nu = 20672] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46704] [nf = 6462] [nu = 24658] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54284] [nf = 7444] [nu = 28644] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61864] [nf = 8426] [nu = 32630] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 69444] [nf = 9408] [nu = 36616] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 77024] [nf = 10390] [nu = 40602] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84604] [nf = 11372] [nu = 44588] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 92184] [nf = 12354] [nu = 48574] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 99764] [nf = 13336] [nu = 52560] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 107344] [nf = 14318] [nu = 56546] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 114924] [nf = 15300] [nu = 60532] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 122504] [nf = 16282] [nu = 64518] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 130084] [nf = 17264] [nu = 68504] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 137664] [nf = 18246] [nu = 72490] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 145244] [nf = 19228] [nu = 76476] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 152824] [nf = 20210] [nu = 80462] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 160404] [nf = 21192] [nu = 84448] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 167984] [nf = 22174] [nu = 88434] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 175564] [nf = 23156] [nu = 92420] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 183144] [nf = 24138] [nu = 96406] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 190724] [nf = 25120] [nu = 100392] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 198304] [nf = 26102] [nu = 104378] [ut = 162]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 198436] [nf = 26102] [nu = 104378] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 199268] [nf = 26116] [nu = 104884] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 200250] [nf = 26394] [nu = 105390] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 205482] [nf = 26672] [nu = 108484] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 212228] [nf = 29650] [nu = 111578] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 300775] [nf = 33152] [nu = 155204] [ut = 172]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 701876] [nf = 38414] [nu = 312240] [ut = 172]
% Loo
% king for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 104 secs [nr = 9242113] [nf = 43676] [nu = 3364636] [ut = 176]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 86362716
% resolvents: 72076131 factors: 14286585
% Number of unit clauses generated: 6386295
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 7.39
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 41 [2] = 121 [6] = 10 [8] = 4
% Total = 176
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 6386295 [2] = 11012101 [3] = 31140641 [4] = 24569713 [5] = 10807096 [6] = 2446870
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product1_3 (+)6 (-)60
% [5] product2_3 (+)6 (-)60
% [6] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)36 (-)140
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 176
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 102284350
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 86362716
% Number of unification failures: 961244963
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 820
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 54733736
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 51114420
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 73558930
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 2940857
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 114
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 479
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.24
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 46
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1047607679
% ConstructUnitClause() = 2940992
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 2.96 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 287876
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------