TSTP Solution File: GRP124-7.004 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP124-7.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP124-7.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 22:48:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.18/0.36 #
% 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 37 Number of unprocessed: 37
% 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.39 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.39 # 37 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.39 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.39 # Found 27 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.39 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.39 # 10 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.39 # 27 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.43 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.43 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (group_element(e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (group_element(e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (group_element(e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (group_element(e_4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (next(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (next(e_2,e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (next(e_3,e_4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (greater(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (greater(e_3,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (greater(e_3,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (greater(e_4,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (greater(e_4,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (greater(e_4,e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (product1(X1,X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (product2(X1,X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_2))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~product(X1,e_1,X2)|~greater(X2,X3)|~next(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (product2(X1,X2,X3)|~product1(X4,X3,X1)|~product1(X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X3,X4,X2)|~product1(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X3,X4,X2)|~product2(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X3,X2,X4)|~product1(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X3,X2,X4)|~product2(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X2,X3,X4)|~product1(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X2,X3,X4)|~product2(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (product1(X1,X2,e_4)|product1(X1,X2,e_3)|product1(X1,X2,e_2)|product1(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (product2(X1,X2,e_4)|product2(X1,X2,e_3)|product2(X1,X2,e_2)|product2(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.18/0.43 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.43 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.43 # Found 11 steps
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (product2(e_1,e_1,e_1)|~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)|~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_68])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_68])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (product2(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_72])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_97, plain, (~product2(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_69])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_145, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~group_element(e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_49])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (product2(e_2,e_1,e_4)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_141, ...])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (product2(e_2,e_1,e_3)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_142, ...])).
% 0.18/0.43 cnf(i_0_143, plain, (product2(e_2,e_1,e_2)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_143, ...])).
% 0.18/0.43 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.43 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.43 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.43 # Returning from population with 6 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.43 # We now have 6 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.43 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.18/0.43 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.43 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------