%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP123-4.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 20:51:18 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2377/GRP/GRP123-4.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 156] [nf = 6] [nu = 84] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 288] [nf = 12] [nu = 168] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1304] [nf = 42] [nu = 540] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2320] [nf = 72] [nu = 912] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3336] [nf = 102] [nu = 1284] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4352] [nf = 132] [nu = 1656] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5368] [nf = 162] [nu = 2028] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6384] [nf = 192] [nu = 2400] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7400] [nf = 222] [nu = 2772] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8416] [nf = 252] [nu = 3144] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 9432] [nf = 282] [nu = 3516] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10448] [nf = 312] [nu = 3888] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 11464] [nf = 342] [nu = 4260] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 12480] [nf = 372] [nu = 4632] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 13496] [nf = 402] [nu = 5004] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 14512] [nf = 432] [nu = 5376] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 15528] [nf = 462] [nu = 5748] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 16544] [nf = 492] [nu = 6120] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 17560] [nf = 522] [nu = 6492] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 18576] [nf = 552] [nu = 6864] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 19592] [nf = 582] [nu = 7236] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 20608] [nf = 612] [nu = 7608] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 21624] [nf = 642] [nu = 7980] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 22640] [nf = 672] [nu = 8352] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 23656] [nf = 702] [nu = 8724] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24672] [nf = 732] [nu = 9096] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 25688] [nf = 762] [nu = 9468] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 26704] [nf = 792] [nu = 9840] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 27720] [nf = 822] [nu = 10212] [ut = 29]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 27744] [nf = 822] [nu = 10212] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 27876] [nf = 828] [nu = 10296] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 28026] [nf = 834] [nu = 10380] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 30426] [nf = 870] [nu = 11346] [ut = 38]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 49002] [nf = 906] [nu = 18198] [ut = 38]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 192246] [nf = 942] [nu = 84114] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 706218] [nf = 148426] [nu = 150030] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8255302] [nf = 295910] [nu = 3485690] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 63 secs [nr = 19649186] [nf = 2425986] [nu = 
% 6821350] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 87540417
% 	resolvents: 83448230	factors: 4092187
% Number of unit clauses generated: 33897350
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 38.72
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 10	[2] = 19	[4] = 9		[6] = 3		
% Total = 41
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 33897350	[2] = 34875681	[3] = 15551032	[4] = 3216354	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)4	(-)6
% [2] product_3		(+)10	(-)18
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)17	(-)24
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 41
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 119348602
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 87540417
% Number of unification failures: 851172709
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 204
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 10310174
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 39653054
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1516804
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 27774833
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 41
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 107
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.38
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 938713126
% ConstructUnitClause() = 27774864
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 28.56 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 291801
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------