TSTP Solution File: GRP123-2.003 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GRP123-2.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:17:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : GRP123-2.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:39:41 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.49/0.79  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.49/0.79  Process 17704 was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.49/0.79  Mon Jun 13 06:39:42 2022
% 0.49/0.79  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_17549_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_17549_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.49/0.79  set(auto2).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.49/0.79      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.49/0.79      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.49/0.79      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.49/0.79  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.49/0.79  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.49/0.79  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.49/0.79  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.49/0.79  clear(print_given).
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (22 formulas)
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.49/0.79  
% 0.49/0.79  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.49/0.79  1 -product(A,e_1,B) | -next(A,C) | -greater(B,C) # label(no_redundancy) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  2 next(e_1,e_2) # label(e_1_then_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  3 next(e_2,e_3) # label(e_2_then_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(e_1,e_1,A) | -greater(A,e_2).  [resolve(1,b,2,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(e_2,e_1,A) | -greater(A,e_3).  [resolve(1,b,3,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  4 -product(e_1,e_1,A) | -greater(A,e_2).  [resolve(1,b,2,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  5 greater(e_2,e_1) # label(e_2_greater_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  6 greater(e_3,e_1) # label(e_3_greater_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  7 greater(e_3,e_2) # label(e_3_greater_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(e_1,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(4,b,7,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  8 -product(e_2,e_1,A) | -greater(A,e_3).  [resolve(1,b,3,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  9 -product(A,B,C) | -product(A,B,D) | equalish(C,D) # label(product_total_function2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  10 -equalish(e_1,e_2) # label(e_1_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  11 -equalish(e_1,e_3) # label(e_1_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  12 -equalish(e_2,e_1) # label(e_2_is_not_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  13 -equalish(e_2,e_3) # label(e_2_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  14 -equalish(e_3,e_1) # label(e_3_is_not_e_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  15 -equalish(e_3,e_2) # label(e_3_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(A,B,e_1) | -product(A,B,e_2).  [resolve(9,c,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(A,B,e_1) | -product(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(9,c,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(A,B,e_2) | -product(A,B,e_3).  [resolve(9,c,13,a)].
% 0.49/0.79  16 -product(A,B,C) | -product(A,D,C) | equalish(B,D) # label(product_right_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.79  Derived: -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(A,e_2,B).  [resolve(16,c,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(16,c,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(A,e_2,B) | -product(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(16,c,13,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  17 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,B,C) | equalish(A,D) # label(product_left_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_2,A,B).  [resolve(17,c,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(17,c,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_2,A,B) | -product(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(17,c,13,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  18 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,E,C) | -product(F,B,A) | -product(F,E,D) | equalish(A,D) # label(qg1_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_2,C,B) | -product(D,A,e_1) | -product(D,C,e_2).  [resolve(18,e,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_3,C,B) | -product(D,A,e_1) | -product(D,C,e_3).  [resolve(18,e,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(e_2,A,B) | -product(e_3,C,B) | -product(D,A,e_2) | -product(D,C,e_3).  [resolve(18,e,13,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  19 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,E,C) | -product(F,B,A) | -product(F,E,D) | equalish(B,E) # label(qg1_2) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(C,e_2,B) | -product(D,e_1,A) | -product(D,e_2,C).  [resolve(19,e,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(C,e_3,B) | -product(D,e_1,A) | -product(D,e_3,C).  [resolve(19,e,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  Derived: -product(A,e_2,B) | -product(C,e_3,B) | -product(D,e_2,A) | -product(D,e_3,C).  [resolve(19,e,13,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.49/0.80  Function symbol KB weights:  e_1=1. e_2=1. e_3=1.
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.49/0.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.49/0.80  % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.49/0.80  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.49/0.80  % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.49/0.80  % Given clauses 39.
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  10 -equalish(e_1,e_2) # label(e_1_is_not_e_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  11 -equalish(e_1,e_3) # label(e_1_is_not_e_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  16 -product(A,B,C) | -product(A,D,C) | equalish(B,D) # label(product_right_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  17 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,B,C) | equalish(A,D) # label(product_left_cancellation) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  19 -product(A,B,C) | -product(D,E,C) | -product(F,B,A) | -product(F,E,D) | equalish(B,E) # label(qg1_2) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  20 group_element(e_1) # label(element_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  21 group_element(e_2) # label(element_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  22 group_element(e_3) # label(element_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  23 product(A,A,A) # label(product_idempotence) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  24 -group_element(A) | -group_element(B) | product(A,B,e_1) | product(A,B,e_2) | product(A,B,e_3) # label(product_total_function1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.49/0.80  29 -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(A,e_2,B).  [resolve(16,c,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  30 -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(A,e_3,B).  [resolve(16,c,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  32 -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_2,A,B).  [resolve(17,c,10,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  33 -product(e_1,A,B) | -product(e_3,A,B).  [resolve(17,c,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  39 -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(C,e_3,B) | -product(D,e_1,A) | -product(D,e_3,C).  [resolve(19,e,11,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  51 -product(A,e_1,B) | -product(B,e_3,B) | -product(B,e_1,A).  [factor(39,b,d)].
% 0.49/0.80  54 -group_element(A) | product(e_3,A,e_1) | product(e_3,A,e_2) | product(e_3,A,e_3).  [resolve(24,a,22,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  55 -group_element(A) | product(e_2,A,e_1) | product(e_2,A,e_2) | product(e_2,A,e_3).  [resolve(24,a,21,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  65 -product(e_2,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(29,b,23,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  67 -product(e_3,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(30,b,23,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  72 -product(e_2,e_1,e_1).  [ur(32,a,23,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  74 -product(e_3,e_1,e_1).  [ur(33,a,23,a)].
% 0.49/0.80  111 product(e_3,e_1,e_2).  [resolve(54,a,20,a),unit_del(a,74),unit_del(c,67)].
% 0.49/0.80  121 -product(e_2,e_1,e_3).  [resolve(111,a,51,c),unit_del(b,23)].
% 0.49/0.80  131 $F.  [resolve(55,a,20,a),unit_del(a,72),unit_del(b,65),unit_del(c,121)].
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  Given=39. Generated=235. Kept=111. proofs=1.
% 0.49/0.80  Usable=36. Sos=68. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=46. Hints=0.
% 0.49/0.80  Megabytes=0.09.
% 0.49/0.80  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.49/0.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.49/0.80  
% 0.49/0.80  Process 17704 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 13 06:39:42 2022
% 0.49/0.80  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------