TSTP Solution File: GRP123-2.003 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP123-2.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:56:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.62s 1.80s
% Output   : Refutation 1.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  10 unt;   5 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(6,axiom,
    ~ e_qualish(e_3,e_1),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ e_qualish(e_3,e_2),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ group_element(A)
    | ~ group_element(B)
    | product(A,B,e_1)
    | product(A,B,e_2)
    | product(A,B,e_3) ),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,B,C)
    | e_qualish(A,D) ),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,E,C)
    | ~ product(F,B,A)
    | ~ product(F,E,D)
    | e_qualish(B,E) ),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(C,D,C)
    | ~ product(C,B,A)
    | e_qualish(B,D) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[13]),
    [iquote('factor,13.2.4')] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    group_element(e_1),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    group_element(e_2),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(29,axiom,
    group_element(e_3),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(30,axiom,
    product(A,A,A),
    file('GRP123-2.003.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( product(e_2,e_3,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_3,e_2)
    | product(e_2,e_3,e_3) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,8,28]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,8,28')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    ( product(e_1,e_3,e_1)
    | product(e_1,e_3,e_2)
    | product(e_1,e_3,e_3) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,8,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,8,27')] ).

cnf(44,plain,
    ( product(e_2,e_3,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_3,e_3) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[33,21,33,30]),7])])]),
    [iquote('hyper,33,21,33,30,unit_del,7,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(46,plain,
    product(e_2,e_3,e_1),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[44,11,30]),7]),
    [iquote('hyper,44,11,30,unit_del,7')] ).

cnf(47,plain,
    ( product(e_1,e_3,e_2)
    | product(e_1,e_3,e_3) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[34,21,34,30]),6])])]),
    [iquote('hyper,34,21,34,30,unit_del,6,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    product(e_1,e_3,e_3),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[47,21,46,30]),6]),
    [iquote('hyper,47,21,46,30,unit_del,6')] ).

cnf(55,plain,
    e_qualish(e_3,e_1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[53,11,30]),
    [iquote('hyper,53,11,30')] ).

cnf(56,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[55,6]),
    [iquote('binary,55.1,6.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GRP123-2.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:00:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.62/1.80  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.62/1.80  The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 1.62/1.80  Wed Jul 27 05:00:40 2022
% 1.62/1.80  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 7895.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.62/1.80  set(auto).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.62/1.80  clear(print_given).
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  list(usable).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] next(e_1,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] next(e_2,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] greater(e_2,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] greater(e_3,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] greater(e_3,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(X,e_1,Y)| -next(X,X1)| -greater(Y,X1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] group_element(e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] group_element(e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] group_element(e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_1,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_1,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_2,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_2,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_3,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -e_qualish(e_3,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -group_element(X)| -group_element(Y)|product(X,Y,e_1)|product(X,Y,e_2)|product(X,Y,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(X,Y,W)| -product(X,Y,Z)|e_qualish(W,Z).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(X,W,Y)| -product(X,Z,Y)|e_qualish(W,Z).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(W,Y,X)| -product(Z,Y,X)|e_qualish(W,Z).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] product(X,X,X).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(X1,Y1,Z1)| -product(X2,Y2,Z1)| -product(Z2,Y1,X1)| -product(Z2,Y2,X2)|e_qualish(X1,X2).
% 1.62/1.80  0 [] -product(X1,Y1,Z1)| -product(X2,Y2,Z1)| -product(Z2,Y1,X1)| -product(Z2,Y2,X2)|e_qualish(Y1,Y2).
% 1.62/1.80  end_of_list.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.62/1.80  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.62/1.80  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.62/1.80     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ------------> process usable:
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 1 [] -product(A,e_1,B)| -next(A,C)| -greater(B,C).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] -e_qualish(e_1,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] -e_qualish(e_1,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] -e_qualish(e_2,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] -e_qualish(e_2,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] -e_qualish(e_3,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] -e_qualish(e_3,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 8 [] -group_element(A)| -group_element(B)|product(A,B,e_1)|product(A,B,e_2)|product(A,B,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|e_qualish(C,D).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,C)|e_qualish(B,D).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,C)|e_qualish(A,D).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=19): 12 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,E,C)| -product(F,B,A)| -product(F,E,D)|e_qualish(A,D).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=19): 13 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,E,C)| -product(F,B,A)| -product(F,E,D)|e_qualish(B,E).
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ------------> process sos:
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 22 [] next(e_1,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] next(e_2,e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 24 [] greater(e_2,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 25 [] greater(e_3,e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 26 [] greater(e_3,e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 27 [] group_element(e_1).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 28 [] group_element(e_2).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 29 [] group_element(e_3).
% 1.62/1.80  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 30 [] product(A,A,A).
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.02 sec ----> 56 [binary,55.1,6.1] $F.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.62/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.62/1.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.62/1.80  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ============ end of search ============
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.62/1.80  clauses given                 23
% 1.62/1.80  clauses generated            904
% 1.62/1.80  clauses kept                  55
% 1.62/1.80  clauses forward subsumed     871
% 1.62/1.80  clauses back subsumed         17
% 1.62/1.80  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.62/1.80  user CPU time          0.02          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.62/1.80  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.62/1.80  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.62/1.80  
% 1.62/1.80  Process 7895 finished Wed Jul 27 05:00:41 2022
% 1.62/1.80  Otter interrupted
% 1.62/1.80  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------