TSTP Solution File: GRP114-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : GRP114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:13:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.78s 2.05s
% Output   : Refutation 4.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   29
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  43 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  42 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  220 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 218   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   0   ^;  76   !;   0   ?;  76   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(multiply_type,type,
    multiply: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(positive_part_type,type,
    positive_part: $i > $i ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(negative_part_type,type,
    negative_part: $i > $i ).

thf(inverse_type,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

thf(identity_type,type,
    identity: $i ).

thf(union_type,type,
    union: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(intersection_type,type,
    intersection: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( negative_part @ A )
      = ( intersection @ A @ identity ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',negative_part) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( negative_part @ A )
      = ( intersection @ A @ identity ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ B )
      = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_union_absorbtion) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ B )
      = B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( positive_part @ A )
      = ( union @ A @ identity ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',positive_part) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( positive_part @ A )
      = ( union @ A @ identity ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_idempotent) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( inverse @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) )
      = ( multiply @ ( inverse @ B ) @ ( inverse @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_product_lemma) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( inverse @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) )
      = ( multiply @ ( inverse @ B ) @ ( inverse @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( union @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_union2) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( union @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ B )
      = ( union @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_commutative) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ B )
      = ( union @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ ( union @ B @ C ) )
      = ( union @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_associative) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ ( union @ B @ C ) )
      = ( union @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( multiply @ A @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( multiply @ A @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) )
      = ( intersection @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_associative) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) )
      = ( intersection @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( inverse @ ( inverse @ A ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_involution) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( inverse @ ( inverse @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( inverse @ A ) @ A )
      = identity ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_inverse) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( inverse @ A ) @ A )
      = identity ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ identity @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_identity) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ identity @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ A @ ( union @ B @ C ) )
      = ( union @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_union1) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ A @ ( union @ B @ C ) )
      = ( union @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ B )
      = ( intersection @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_commutative) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( intersection @ A @ B )
      = ( intersection @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ( ( inverse @ identity )
    = identity ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_of_identity) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( ( inverse @ identity )
    = identity ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( intersection @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_intersection2) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( intersection @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ B )
      = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_intersection_absorbtion) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ B )
      = B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( multiply @ ( positive_part @ a ) @ ( negative_part @ a ) )
   != a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_product) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( multiply @ ( positive_part @ a ) @ ( negative_part @ a ) )
   != a ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ A @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) )
      = ( intersection @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_intersection1) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiply @ A @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) )
      = ( intersection @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_idempotent) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( union @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(184,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[61,33,53,41,45,49,39,35,63,31,43,55,51,47,37,25,57,29,22,59,27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Fri May 19 02:08:34 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.82/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.23/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (120ms). 
% 1.23/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.56/1.17  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.17  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.83/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 20 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.91/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 20 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.91/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.91/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.91/1.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.78/2.05  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.78/2.05  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.78/2.05  % Time passed: 1527ms (effective reasoning time: 1071ms)
% 4.78/2.05  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.78/2.05  % Axioms used in derivation (20): multiply_intersection1, intersection_associative, left_identity, multiply_union1, union_commutative, intersection_commutative, union_idempotent, multiply_intersection2, multiply_union2, associativity, intersection_idempotent, union_intersection_absorbtion, negative_part, inverse_product_lemma, positive_part, inverse_of_identity, intersection_union_absorbtion, left_inverse, union_associative, inverse_involution
% 4.78/2.05  % No. of inferences in proof: 43
% 4.78/2.05  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1527 ms resp. 1071 ms w/o parsing
% 4.79/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.79/2.08  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------