TSTP Solution File: GRP113-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 33.10s 4.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 33.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GRP113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 04:56:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.37 #
% 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 16 Number of unprocessed: 16
% 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.37 # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.37 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.37 # Found 11 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.14/0.37 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.37 # 5 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.37 # 11 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.14/0.37 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.37 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 30.07/4.13 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.07/4.13 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.14 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.14 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.14 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.14 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.14 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.14 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.14 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.14 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.17 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.17 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 30.14/4.19 # Creating equality axioms
% 30.14/4.19 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 33.10/4.52 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 33.10/4.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.10/4.52 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.10/4.52 # Begin clausification derivation
% 33.10/4.52
% 33.10/4.52 # End clausification derivation
% 33.10/4.52 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (multiply(X1,identity)=X1)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (identity!=a)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_27, hypothesis, (identity!=b)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_23, hypothesis, (b!=a)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_28, hypothesis, (identity!=c)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_24, hypothesis, (c!=a)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_26, hypothesis, (c!=b)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (multiply(a,a)!=identity|multiply(b,b)!=identity|multiply(c,c)!=identity)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_22, hypothesis, (X1=c|X1=b|X1=a|X1=identity)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (multiply(a,multiply(a,multiply(a,a)))!=identity|multiply(a,multiply(a,a))!=c|multiply(a,a)!=b)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (multiply(b,multiply(b,multiply(b,b)))!=identity|multiply(b,multiply(b,b))!=a|multiply(b,b)!=c)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (multiply(c,multiply(c,multiply(c,c)))!=identity|multiply(c,multiply(c,c))!=b|multiply(c,c)!=a)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_189, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 33.10/4.52 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 33.10/4.52 # Begin printing tableau
% 33.10/4.52 # Found 6 steps
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_189, plain, (X7=X7), inference(start_rule)).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_222, plain, (X7=X7), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_193])).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_248, plain, (multiply(identity,identity)!=identity), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_246, plain, (multiply(X7,multiply(identity,identity))=multiply(X7,identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_192])).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_271, plain, (multiply(X7,identity)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 33.10/4.52 cnf(i_0_269, plain, (multiply(X7,multiply(identity,identity))=X7), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_269, ...])).
% 33.10/4.52 # End printing tableau
% 33.10/4.52 # SZS output end
% 33.10/4.52 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 33.10/4.54 # Child (25410) has found a proof.
% 33.10/4.54
% 33.10/4.54 # Proof search is over...
% 33.10/4.54 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------