TSTP Solution File: GRP097-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:36:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  37 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (  51 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(divide(Y,Z),divide(X,Z)))) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X,Y) = divide(X,inverse(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    ( divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1))
    | divide(divide(inverse(b2),inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2
    | divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms,multiply,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(Y,divide(X,inverse(divide(divide(Y,Z),divide(U,Z))))))) = U,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(Y,Y))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(Y,X))) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X,Y)),inverse(X)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),inverse(divide(Z,divide(Z,Y)))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    X = inverse(divide(divide(Y,Y),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),inverse(Y)) = inverse(divide(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X,Y),X)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[16,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( inverse(divide(a1,a1)) != inverse(divide(b1,b1))
    | divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,27,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,X)) = inverse(divide(Y,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[31,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,Y)) = inverse(divide(divide(X,Z),divide(Y,Z))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[31,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    divide(divide(X,X),inverse(Y)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,divide(Y,inverse(X)))) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(60,plain,
    divide(divide(X,X),Y) = divide(divide(Z,Y),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[47,31,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    divide(divide(X,inverse(Y)),X) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,49,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    divide(divide(X,X),Y) = divide(Z,divide(Y,inverse(Z))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[47,49,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = inverse(divide(X,divide(Z,divide(Y,inverse(Z))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[28,49,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(81,plain,
    X = divide(Y,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[47,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),inverse(Y)) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[18,81,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[31,82,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,Y)) = divide(Y,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,82,theory(equality)]),28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = divide(divide(Z,divide(Y,inverse(Z))),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[75,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(102,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),inverse(Y)) = divide(Y,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[28,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(103,plain,
    divide(X,Y) = divide(divide(X,Z),divide(Y,Z)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(105,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(Y)) = divide(Y,inverse(X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[82,71,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(106,plain,
    divide(divide(b3,inverse(a3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[91,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(107,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),X) = inverse(Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[71,83,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(108,plain,
    divide(divide(X,X),Y) = inverse(Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[60,107,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(109,plain,
    inverse(X) = divide(Y,divide(X,inverse(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[72,108,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(110,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = divide(inverse(Y),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[85,109,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    divide(divide(b3,inverse(a3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[106,110,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(114,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),inverse(Z)) = divide(Z,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[102,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(115,plain,
    divide(c3,divide(inverse(a3),b3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[111,114,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(126,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Z)) = divide(Z,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[103,107,theory(equality)]),114,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[115,110,126,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 08:37:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T08:37:03
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T08:37:03
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  #||
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.57  ||#
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.38/0.57  ;       731 formulas have been input or derived (from 38 formulas).
% 0.38/0.57  ;       127 (17%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.38/0.57  ;          104 (82%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.38/0.57  ;           23 (18%) are still being kept.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.002   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.018  19%   Process new row              (695 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Resolution                   (74 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.019  20%   Paramodulation               (37 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (4 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (4 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (4 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.013  14%   Forward simplification       (620 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.013  14%   Backward simplification      (126 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Ordering                     (1,356 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.024  25%   Other
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.095        Total
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.101        Real time
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Term-hash-array has 472 terms in all.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (1 at peak, 4 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (36 at peak, 111 added, 110 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 4 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 4 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 73 entries (241 at peak, 594 added, 521 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 773 nodes (880 at peak, 1,424 added, 651 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 73 entries (241 at peak, 594 added, 521 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 182 nodes (741 at peak, 1,720 added, 1,538 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 1,395 generalization terms in 2,690 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 581 instance terms in 143 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 2,151 unifiable terms in 312 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 24
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to give has 13 entries:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     2 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 25)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 20)          6 with value (4 23)
% 0.38/0.57  Evaluation took:
% 0.38/0.57    0.102 seconds of real time
% 0.38/0.57    0.085642 seconds of user run time
% 0.38/0.57    0.016123 seconds of system run time
% 0.38/0.57    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.38/0.57    0 page faults and
% 0.38/0.57    8,410,384 bytes consed.
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T08:37:03
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------