TSTP Solution File: GRP091-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP091-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:37:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 136.46s 300.18s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 33 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 45 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MUyAiclftX/E---3.1_16585.p',multiply) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MUyAiclftX/E---3.1_16585.p',inverse) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MUyAiclftX/E---3.1_16585.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
| multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
| multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MUyAiclftX/E---3.1_16585.p',prove_these_axioms) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),X2) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
divide(multiply(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
divide(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X1) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X1)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
divide(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),X1)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(X1,X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(inverse(X1),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
multiply(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
multiply(X1,inverse(X2)) = divide(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_5]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
| multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
| multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4) ),
prove_these_axioms ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
divide(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
| multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| divide(a1,a1) != divide(b1,b1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_26]),c_0_18]),c_0_26]),c_0_18]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
multiply(X1,divide(X2,divide(multiply(X2,X1),X3))) = X3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
divide(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_24]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
multiply(b3,multiply(a3,c3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_26]),c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP091-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:37:35 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MUyAiclftX/E---3.1_16585.p
% 136.46/300.18 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 136.46/300.18 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.46/300.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # new_bool_3 with pid 16698 completed with status 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 136.46/300.18 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.46/300.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 136.46/300.18 # Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 136.46/300.18 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 16703 completed with status 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 136.46/300.18 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.46/300.18 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 136.46/300.18 # Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 136.46/300.18 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 136.46/300.18 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 136.46/300.18 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 136.46/300.18 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 136.46/300.18
% 136.46/300.18 # Proof found!
% 136.46/300.18 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 136.46/300.18 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 136.46/300.18 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 136.46/300.18 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 136.46/300.18 # Initial clauses : 4
% 136.46/300.18 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 136.46/300.18 # Processed clauses : 114
% 136.46/300.18 # ...of these trivial : 22
% 136.46/300.18 # ...subsumed : 42
% 136.46/300.18 # ...remaining for further processing : 50
% 136.46/300.18 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 136.46/300.18 # Generated clauses : 626
% 136.46/300.18 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 378
% 136.46/300.18 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Paramodulations : 625
% 136.46/300.18 # Factorizations : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # NegExts : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Total rewrite steps : 707
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional check models : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 136.46/300.18 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 136.46/300.18 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 136.46/300.18 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 136.46/300.18 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 186
% 136.46/300.18 # ...number of literals in the above : 186
% 136.46/300.18 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 136.46/300.18 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 136.46/300.18 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # BW rewrite match attempts : 112
% 136.46/300.18 # BW rewrite match successes : 75
% 136.46/300.18 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Condensation successes : 0
% 136.46/300.18 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3728
% 136.46/300.18
% 136.46/300.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 136.46/300.18 # User time : 0.009 s
% 136.46/300.18 # System time : 0.001 s
% 136.46/300.18 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 136.46/300.18 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 136.46/300.18
% 136.46/300.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 136.46/300.18 # User time : 0.009 s
% 136.46/300.18 # System time : 0.004 s
% 136.46/300.18 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 136.46/300.18 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 136.46/300.18 % E---3.1 exiting
% 136.46/300.18 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------