TSTP Solution File: GRP075-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GRP075-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:16:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP075-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:16:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.41  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.44  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.18/0.44    fof(identity, axiom, ![X]: identity=double_divide(X, inverse(X))).
% 0.18/0.44    fof(inverse, axiom, ![X2]: inverse(X2)=double_divide(X2, identity)).
% 0.18/0.44    fof(multiply, axiom, ![Y, X2]: multiply(X2, Y)=double_divide(double_divide(Y, X2), identity)).
% 0.18/0.44    fof(prove_these_axioms, negated_conjecture, multiply(inverse(a1), a1)!=identity | (multiply(identity, a2)!=a2 | multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3)!=multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)))).
% 0.18/0.44    fof(single_axiom, axiom, ![Z, U, X2, Y2]: double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2, double_divide(Y2, identity)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, double_divide(U, double_divide(U, identity))), double_divide(X2, identity))), Y2)=Z).
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.18/0.44  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.18/0.44  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.18/0.44    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.18/0.44    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.18/0.44  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.18/0.44  variables of u and v.
% 0.18/0.44  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.18/0.44  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 1 (inverse): inverse(X) = double_divide(X, identity).
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 2 (identity): identity = double_divide(X, inverse(X)).
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 3 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = double_divide(double_divide(Y, X), identity).
% 0.18/0.45  Axiom 4 (single_axiom): double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(Y, identity)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, double_divide(W, double_divide(W, identity))), double_divide(X, identity))), Y) = Z.
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 5: inverse(double_divide(X, Y)) = multiply(Y, X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(X, Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(X, Y), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 3 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(Y, X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 6: multiply(inverse(X), X) = inverse(identity).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(X, inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(identity)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 7: double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(inverse(Z), inverse(X))), Y) = Z.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(inverse(Z), inverse(X))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(inverse(Z), double_divide(X, identity))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, identity), double_divide(X, identity))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, double_divide(W, inverse(W))), double_divide(X, identity))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, double_divide(W, double_divide(W, identity))), double_divide(X, identity))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(Y, identity)), double_divide(double_divide(Z, double_divide(W, double_divide(W, identity))), double_divide(X, identity))), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 4 (single_axiom) }
% 0.18/0.45    Z
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 8: double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), X) = Y.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(Y), inverse(X))), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(Y), inverse(X)), identity), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(Y), inverse(X)), double_divide(inverse(Y), inverse(inverse(Y)))), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.18/0.45    Y
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 9: double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(X)), inverse(X)), inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.45    X
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 10: inverse(identity) = identity.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(inverse(identity)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    identity
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 11: multiply(inverse(X), identity) = inverse(X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), inverse(identity))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 12: multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y))) = inverse(Y).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(Y)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 13: multiply(X, inverse(X)) = identity.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), identity))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), inverse(identity)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.18/0.45    identity
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 14: double_divide(identity, X) = inverse(X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(identity, X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(X))), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 15: multiply(identity, X) = inverse(inverse(X)).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(identity, X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(X, identity))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 16: inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))) = X.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(multiply(identity, inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(multiply(inverse(identity), inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(identity), inverse(X)), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.45    X
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 17: inverse(inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(X))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(X, identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.18/0.45    X
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 18: inverse(multiply(X, Y)) = double_divide(Y, X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(multiply(X, Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(double_divide(Y, X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(Y, X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 19: multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), inverse(Y)) = X.
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), double_divide(Y, identity))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(Y, identity), double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(Y, identity), double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(Y, inverse(identity)), double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))), identity)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.18/0.45    X
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 20: inverse(inverse(inverse(X))) = double_divide(identity, X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(inverse(identity), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(identity, X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 21: multiply(double_divide(X, Y), Y) = inverse(X).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, Y), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))), Y), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))), Y), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y))))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 19 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 20 }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(identity, X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 22: double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Y), X) = inverse(Y).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Y), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y))))), X)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 20 }
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(identity, Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(Y)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 23: double_divide(X, inverse(Y)) = multiply(inverse(X), Y).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    double_divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    inverse(multiply(inverse(Y), X))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 21 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(multiply(inverse(Y), X), Y), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 22 }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), Y)
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Lemma 24: multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)) = double_divide(X, Y).
% 0.18/0.45  Proof:
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 22 R->L }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))), X), inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.18/0.45    multiply(double_divide(multiply(Y, X), inverse(inverse(inverse(Y)))), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by lemma 20 }
% 0.18/0.46    multiply(double_divide(multiply(Y, X), double_divide(identity, Y)), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.18/0.46    multiply(double_divide(multiply(Y, X), inverse(Y)), inverse(Y))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 21 }
% 0.18/0.46    inverse(multiply(Y, X))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 18 }
% 0.18/0.46    double_divide(X, Y)
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  Lemma 25: multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), Y)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.46  Proof:
% 0.18/0.46    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.18/0.46    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.18/0.46    Y
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms): tuple(multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(identity, a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3)) = tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3))).
% 0.18/0.46  Proof:
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(identity, a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 15 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(multiply(inverse(a1), a1), inverse(inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(inverse(identity), inverse(inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, inverse(inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(inverse(double_divide(b3, a3)), c3))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, double_divide(double_divide(b3, a3), inverse(c3)))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(inverse(double_divide(b3, a3)), inverse(inverse(c3))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, double_divide(double_divide(b3, a3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, double_divide(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 25 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))), inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 25 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))))))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))))))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(inverse(b3)))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 20 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(identity, multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 18 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))), inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 23 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))))), multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(inverse(b3)), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 24 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))), multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))), inverse(b3)), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 25 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))), inverse(b3)), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(multiply(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)), inverse(b3)), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))
% 0.18/0.46  = { by lemma 19 }
% 0.18/0.46    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 25 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, multiply(inverse(b3), double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3))))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), identity)), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(b3), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(identity))), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(b3))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(identity))), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(b3))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))), inverse(identity))), inverse(b3))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(c3)))))))
% 0.18/0.47  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.18/0.47    tuple(identity, a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)))
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------