TSTP Solution File: GRP063-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP063-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:45:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  46 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   60 (  59 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  100 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X2),X3),divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tKkYu31W03/E---3.1_24974.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tKkYu31W03/E---3.1_24974.p',inverse) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tKkYu31W03/E---3.1_24974.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tKkYu31W03/E---3.1_24974.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X2),X3),divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3))) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(inverse(X2),X3),divide(inverse(X1),X3))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(multiply(divide(inverse(X1),X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]),c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),X2) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = inverse(inverse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(divide(a1,a1),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X1) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    divide(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,X2))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    divide(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    divide(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = divide(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X2)) = divide(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
    prove_these_axioms ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = inverse(inverse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(inverse(X1),divide(divide(inverse(X2),X3),divide(X4,X3))))) = X4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(inverse(X2),X3)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | inverse(inverse(a2)) != a2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    divide(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(divide(divide(inverse(X2),X3),divide(X4,X3)),X1))) = X4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiply(X1,divide(X2,X3)) = divide(X1,divide(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(divide(a1,a1),a2) != a2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    divide(multiply(divide(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X3)),X3) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_23]),c_0_41]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = divide(a1,a1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : GRP063-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:37:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tKkYu31W03/E---3.1_24974.p
% 0.21/0.52  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # new_bool_3 with pid 25052 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25057 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.21/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 168
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 48
% 0.21/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 43
% 0.21/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 77
% 0.21/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 0.21/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 1225
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 779
% 0.21/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 1225
% 0.21/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1660
% 0.21/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 390
% 0.21/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 390
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 52
% 0.21/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.21/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 90
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 53
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10059
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.21/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------