TSTP Solution File: GRP052-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GRP052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 74.10s 74.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 74.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : GRP052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 04:21:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.36  #
% 0.19/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.36  # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2
% 0.19/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 70.55/70.74  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 70.55/70.74  # Local unification is enabled...
% 70.55/70.74  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 70.55/70.74  # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 70.55/70.74  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 70.55/70.74  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 70.55/70.74  # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 70.55/70.74  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 70.55/70.74  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 70.55/70.74  # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 70.55/70.74  
% 70.55/70.74  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 70.55/70.74  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 70.55/70.74  # Creating equality axioms
% 70.55/70.74  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 74.10/74.29  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 74.10/74.29  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 74.10/74.29  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 74.10/74.29  # Begin clausification derivation
% 74.10/74.29  
% 74.10/74.29  # End clausification derivation
% 74.10/74.29  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))),X3))),X2)))=X3)).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))|multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=multiply(inverse(b1),b1)|multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)!=a2)).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 74.10/74.29  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 74.10/74.29  # Begin printing tableau
% 74.10/74.29  # Found 6 steps
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10)))=inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))), inference(start_rule)).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10)))=inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14)))!=X13), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (multiply(multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14))),multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10))))=multiply(X13,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (multiply(X13,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2)))!=X9), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 74.10/74.29  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (multiply(multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14))),multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10))))=X9), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_50, ...])).
% 74.10/74.29  # End printing tableau
% 74.10/74.29  # SZS output end
% 74.10/74.29  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 74.10/74.29  # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 74.10/74.29  # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 74.10/74.29  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 74.10/74.29  # Proof search is over...
% 74.10/74.29  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------