TSTP Solution File: GRP047-2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GRP047-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:36:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.35s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   79 (   0 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(product_substitution3,axiom,
    ( product(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ product(X3,X4,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',product_substitution3) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    product(identity,X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',left_identity) ).

cnf(total_function2,axiom,
    ( equalish(X3,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',total_function2) ).

cnf(associativity1,axiom,
    ( product(X1,X5,X6)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X3,X4,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',associativity1) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    product(inverse(X1),X1,identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',left_inverse) ).

cnf(a_equals_b,hypothesis,
    equalish(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',a_equals_b) ).

cnf(total_function1,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',total_function1) ).

cnf(prove_multiply_substitution2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiply(c,a),multiply(c,b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p',prove_multiply_substitution2) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( product(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ product(X3,X4,X1) ),
    product_substitution3 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    product(identity,X1,X1),
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( equalish(X3,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X4) ),
    total_function2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( product(X1,X5,X6)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X3,X4,X6) ),
    associativity1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( product(identity,X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ product(identity,X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    product(inverse(X1),X1,identity),
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,identity)
    | ~ product(X4,X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ product(identity,X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    equalish(a,b),
    a_equals_b ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    total_function1 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,identity)
    | ~ product(inverse(X2),X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( product(inverse(X1),X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    equalish(b,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    equalish(multiply(identity,X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,identity)
    | ~ product(X2,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(X1,a)
    | ~ equalish(b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    equalish(X1,multiply(identity,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,identity)
    | ~ product(X2,inverse(X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,multiply(X2,X3))
    | ~ product(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ equalish(multiply(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    equalish(multiply(identity,b),a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    equalish(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiply(c,a),multiply(c,b)),
    prove_multiply_substitution2 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( product(X1,X2,multiply(X3,X4))
    | ~ product(X5,X4,X2)
    | ~ product(X1,X5,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    product(identity,b,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(c,a,multiply(c,b)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    ( product(X1,a,multiply(X2,b))
    | ~ product(X1,identity,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( product(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(inverse(X1),X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(c,identity,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    product(X1,identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem    : GRP047-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:24:08 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fL8dd8fWpc/E---3.1_22459.p
% 1.35/0.63  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1.35/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.35/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # sh5l with pid 22540 completed with status 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Result found by sh5l
% 1.35/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.35/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.35/0.63  # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.35/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22547 completed with status 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.35/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.35/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.35/0.63  # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.35/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.35/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 1.35/0.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.35/0.63  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.35/0.63  
% 1.35/0.63  # Proof found!
% 1.35/0.63  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.35/0.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.35/0.63  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 1.35/0.63  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 1.35/0.63  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 1.35/0.63  # Processed clauses                    : 2575
% 1.35/0.63  # ...of these trivial                  : 43
% 1.35/0.63  # ...subsumed                          : 1853
% 1.35/0.63  # ...remaining for further processing  : 679
% 1.35/0.63  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Backward-subsumed                    : 34
% 1.35/0.63  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 1.35/0.63  # Generated clauses                    : 15050
% 1.35/0.63  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11808
% 1.35/0.63  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.35/0.63  # Paramodulations                      : 15050
% 1.35/0.63  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5746
% 1.35/0.63  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.35/0.63  # Current number of processed clauses  : 625
% 1.35/0.63  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 63
% 1.35/0.63  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.35/0.63  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 1.35/0.63  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 557
% 1.35/0.63  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9221
% 1.35/0.63  # ...number of literals in the above   : 24602
% 1.35/0.63  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 1.35/0.63  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36197
% 1.35/0.63  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34413
% 1.35/0.63  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1873
% 1.35/0.63  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 1.35/0.63  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 195
% 1.35/0.63  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 1.35/0.63  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.35/0.63  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 158598
% 1.35/0.63  
% 1.35/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.35/0.63  # User time                : 0.172 s
% 1.35/0.63  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 1.35/0.63  # Total time               : 0.180 s
% 1.35/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 1.35/0.63  
% 1.35/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.35/0.63  # User time                : 0.172 s
% 1.35/0.63  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 1.35/0.63  # Total time               : 0.182 s
% 1.35/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 1.35/0.63  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.35/0.63  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------