TSTP Solution File: GRP044-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GRP044-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:39:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.72s 1.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 10 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 18 ~; 15 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 4 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 (; 30 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ product > equalish > multiply > #nlpp > inverse > result > identity > c > b > a
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
a: $i ).
tff(product,type,
product: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(inverse,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(multiply,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(b,type,
b: $i ).
tff(identity,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(equalish,type,
equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(result,type,
result: $i ).
tff(c,type,
c: $i ).
tff(f_98,axiom,
equalish(a,b),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_51,axiom,
! [X] : product(identity,X,X),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_95,axiom,
! [X,Y,W,Z] :
( ~ equalish(X,Y)
| ~ product(W,Z,X)
| product(W,Z,Y) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_99,axiom,
product(a,c,result),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_87,axiom,
! [W,U,Z,X,Y,V] :
( ~ product(X,Y,U)
| ~ product(Y,Z,V)
| ~ product(X,V,W)
| product(U,Z,W) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_101,axiom,
~ product(b,c,result),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_16,plain,
equalish(a,b),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_98]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [X_1] : product(identity,X_1,X_1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).
tff(c_48,plain,
! [W_36,Z_37,Y_38,X_39] :
( product(W_36,Z_37,Y_38)
| ~ product(W_36,Z_37,X_39)
| ~ equalish(X_39,Y_38) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_95]) ).
tff(c_59,plain,
! [X_1,Y_38] :
( product(identity,X_1,Y_38)
| ~ equalish(X_1,Y_38) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_48]) ).
tff(c_18,plain,
product(a,c,result),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_99]) ).
tff(c_93,plain,
! [W_46,Z_47,X_48,Y_51,U_49,V_50] :
( product(U_49,Z_47,W_46)
| ~ product(X_48,V_50,W_46)
| ~ product(Y_51,Z_47,V_50)
| ~ product(X_48,Y_51,U_49) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).
tff(c_326,plain,
! [U_76,Z_77,X_78,Y_79] :
( product(U_76,Z_77,X_78)
| ~ product(Y_79,Z_77,X_78)
| ~ product(identity,Y_79,U_76) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_93]) ).
tff(c_561,plain,
! [U_94] :
( product(U_94,c,result)
| ~ product(identity,a,U_94) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_326]) ).
tff(c_603,plain,
! [Y_95] :
( product(Y_95,c,result)
| ~ equalish(a,Y_95) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_561]) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
~ product(b,c,result),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).
tff(c_630,plain,
~ equalish(a,b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_603,c_20]) ).
tff(c_645,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_630]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GRP044-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 21:42:51 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.72/1.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.72/1.97
% 3.72/1.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.72/2.00
% 3.72/2.00 Inference rules
% 3.72/2.00 ----------------------
% 3.72/2.00 #Ref : 0
% 3.72/2.00 #Sup : 159
% 3.72/2.00 #Fact : 0
% 3.72/2.00 #Define : 0
% 3.72/2.00 #Split : 3
% 3.72/2.00 #Chain : 0
% 3.72/2.00 #Close : 0
% 3.72/2.00
% 3.72/2.00 Ordering : KBO
% 3.72/2.00
% 3.72/2.00 Simplification rules
% 3.72/2.00 ----------------------
% 3.72/2.00 #Subsume : 5
% 3.72/2.00 #Demod : 35
% 3.72/2.00 #Tautology : 26
% 3.72/2.00 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 3.72/2.00 #BackRed : 0
% 3.72/2.00
% 3.72/2.00 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.72/2.00 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.72/2.00
% 3.72/2.00 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.72/2.00 ----------------------
% 3.72/2.01 Preprocessing : 0.42
% 3.72/2.01 Parsing : 0.23
% 3.72/2.01 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 3.72/2.01 Main loop : 0.49
% 3.72/2.01 Inferencing : 0.19
% 3.72/2.01 Reduction : 0.13
% 3.72/2.01 Demodulation : 0.09
% 3.72/2.01 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.72/2.01 Subsumption : 0.12
% 3.72/2.01 Abstraction : 0.02
% 3.72/2.01 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.72/2.01 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.72/2.01 Total : 0.97
% 3.72/2.01 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.72/2.01 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.72/2.01 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.72/2.01 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------