TSTP Solution File: GRP037-3 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GRP037-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ subgroup_member(u)
| product(another_identity,u,u) ),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ subgroup_member(u)
| product(another_inverse(u),u,another_identity) ),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ product(u,v,w)
| ~ product(x,v,w)
| equal(u,x) ),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
subgroup_member(a),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
~ equal(inverse(a),another_inverse(a)),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
product(identity,u,u),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
product(inverse(u),u,identity),
file('GRP037-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(21,plain,
( ~ product(inverse(a),u,v)
| ~ product(another_inverse(a),u,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,10]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.2,10.0')] ).
cnf(28,plain,
~ product(another_inverse(a),a,identity),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,21]),
[iquote('0:Res:13.0,21.0')] ).
cnf(48,plain,
( ~ product(u,v,v)
| equal(identity,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,7]),
[iquote('0:Res:11.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(82,plain,
( ~ subgroup_member(u)
| equal(identity,another_identity) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,48]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.1,48.0')] ).
cnf(105,plain,
equal(identity,another_identity),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[82,8]),
[iquote('0:EmS:82.0,8.0')] ).
cnf(111,plain,
~ product(another_inverse(a),a,another_identity),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[105,28]),
[iquote('0:Rew:105.0,28.0')] ).
cnf(165,plain,
~ subgroup_member(a),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,111]),
[iquote('0:Res:4.1,111.0')] ).
cnf(166,plain,
$false,
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[165,8]),
[iquote('0:SSi:165.0,8.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP037-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:12:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.43 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.43 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.43 SPASS derived 135 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 94 clauses.
% 0.20/0.43 SPASS allocated 75704 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.43 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.43 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.43 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.43 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 15 :
% 0.20/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.43 Formulae used in the proof : another_left_identity another_left_inverse product_left_cancellation a_is_in_subgroup prove_two_inverses_are_equal left_identity left_inverse
% 0.20/0.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------