TSTP Solution File: GRP033-3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP033-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.51s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP033-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:35:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon Jun 13 06:35:07 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8705.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.12/0.35  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  There is a clause for symmetry of equality is, so it is
% 0.12/0.35  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.12/0.35  paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} equalish(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 68
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 0.12/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.12/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.12/0.38     distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.38     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.51/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.51/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 4 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 2799 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 5 [ 1 1 170 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 6 [ 1 1 4409 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 7 [ 2 5 118709 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.37 sec ----> 34 [hyper,31,15,18,17] {-} $F.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.51/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.51/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  13 [] {+} -subgroup_member(A)| -subgroup_member(B)| -product(A,inverse(B),C)|subgroup_member(C).
% 0.51/0.75  14 [] {+} -subgroup_member(A)|subgroup_member(j(A)).
% 0.51/0.75  15 [] {+} -product(j(A),A,j(A))| -product(A,j(A),j(A))| -subgroup_member(A).
% 0.51/0.75  17 [] {+} product(identity,A,A).
% 0.51/0.75  18 [] {+} product(A,identity,A).
% 0.51/0.75  20 [] {+} product(A,inverse(A),identity).
% 0.51/0.75  22 [] {+} subgroup_member(a).
% 0.51/0.75  23 [hyper,22,14] {+} subgroup_member(j(a)).
% 0.51/0.75  31 [hyper,20,13,23,23] {-} subgroup_member(identity).
% 0.51/0.75  34 [hyper,31,15,18,17] {-} $F.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.51/0.75  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  ============ end of search ============
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  true clauses given           2      (25.0%)
% 0.51/0.75  false clauses given          6
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.51/0.75     4  0         2
% 0.51/0.75     5  1         1
% 0.51/0.75     6  2         3
% 0.51/0.75  tot:  3         6      (66.7% true)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Model 7 [ 2 5 118709 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.51/0.75  
% 0.51/0.75  Process 8705 finished Mon Jun 13 06:35:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------