TSTP Solution File: GRP033-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP033-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:36:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(closure_of_product_and_inverse,axiom,
( subgroup_member(X3)
| ~ subgroup_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup_member(X2)
| ~ product(X1,inverse(X2),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',closure_of_product_and_inverse) ).
cnf(right_inverse,axiom,
product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',right_inverse) ).
cnf(a_is_in_subgroup,hypothesis,
subgroup_member(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',a_is_in_subgroup) ).
cnf(prove_subgr2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ product(j(X1),X1,j(X1))
| ~ product(X1,j(X1),j(X1))
| ~ subgroup_member(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',prove_subgr2) ).
cnf(right_identity,axiom,
product(X1,identity,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',right_identity) ).
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
product(identity,X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p',left_identity) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( subgroup_member(X3)
| ~ subgroup_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup_member(X2)
| ~ product(X1,inverse(X2),X3) ),
closure_of_product_and_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
right_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( subgroup_member(identity)
| ~ subgroup_member(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
subgroup_member(a),
a_is_in_subgroup ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ product(j(X1),X1,j(X1))
| ~ product(X1,j(X1),j(X1))
| ~ subgroup_member(X1) ),
prove_subgr2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
product(X1,identity,X1),
right_identity ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
subgroup_member(identity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
product(identity,X1,X1),
left_identity ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : GRP033-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.38 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:37:46 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ypkljAlt1s/E---3.1_25637.p
% 0.24/0.55 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25716 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: FHHNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25722 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: FHHNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # partial match(1): FHUNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.24/0.55 # Processed clauses : 41
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.24/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Generated clauses : 14
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.24/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Paramodulations : 14
% 0.24/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.24/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 35
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.24/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.24/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 719
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.24/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------