TSTP Solution File: GRP029-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP029-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:55:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.64s 1.87s
% Output   : Refutation 1.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(B,D,E)
    | ~ product(C,D,F)
    | product(A,E,F) ),
    file('GRP029-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(B,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,E,F)
    | product(C,D,F) ),
    file('GRP029-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ~ product(not_right_identity(A),A,not_right_identity(A)),
    file('GRP029-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    product(identity,A,A),
    file('GRP029-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    product(inverse(A),A,identity),
    file('GRP029-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    product(inverse(inverse(A)),identity,A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,10,16,15]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,10,16,15')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    product(inverse(identity),A,A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,10,15,15]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,10,15,15')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    product(identity,inverse(identity),identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,11,16,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,11,16,16')] ).

cnf(123,plain,
    product(A,inverse(identity),A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,11,17,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,11,17,19')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[123,12]),
    [iquote('binary,123.1,12.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : GRP029-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:20:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.64/1.87  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.64/1.87  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.64/1.87  Wed Jul 27 05:20:05 2022
% 1.64/1.87  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 16494.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.64/1.87  set(auto).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.64/1.87  clear(print_given).
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  list(usable).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] e_qualish(X,X).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(Y,X).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -e_qualish(Y,Z)|e_qualish(X,Z).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(multiply(X,W),multiply(Y,W)).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(multiply(W,X),multiply(W,Y)).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(X,W,Z)|product(Y,W,Z).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(W,X,Z)|product(W,Y,Z).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)| -product(W,Z,X)|product(W,Z,Y).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -e_qualish(X,Y)|e_qualish(inverse(X),inverse(Y)).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] product(X,Y,multiply(X,Y)).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -product(X,Y,Z)| -product(X,Y,W)|e_qualish(Z,W).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(U,Z,W)|product(X,V,W).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(X,V,W)|product(U,Z,W).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] product(identity,A,A).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] product(inverse(A),A,identity).
% 1.64/1.87  0 [] -product(not_right_identity(A),A,not_right_identity(A)).
% 1.64/1.87  end_of_list.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.64/1.87  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.64/1.87  in usable.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.64/1.87     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ------------> process usable:
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(B,A).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 2 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -e_qualish(B,C)|e_qualish(A,C).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 4 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(multiply(C,A),multiply(C,B)).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(A,C,D)|product(B,C,D).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(C,A,D)|product(C,B,D).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] -e_qualish(A,B)| -product(C,D,A)|product(C,D,B).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(inverse(A),inverse(B)).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|e_qualish(C,D).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 10 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(C,D,F)|product(A,E,F).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 11 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(A,E,F)|product(C,D,F).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 12 [] -product(not_right_identity(A),A,not_right_identity(A)).
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ------------> process sos:
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] e_qualish(A,A).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 14 [] product(A,B,multiply(A,B)).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] product(identity,A,A).
% 1.64/1.87  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] product(inverse(A),A,identity).
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 124 [binary,123.1,12.1] $F.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.64/1.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.64/1.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ============ end of search ============
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.64/1.87  clauses given                 11
% 1.64/1.87  clauses generated            369
% 1.64/1.87  clauses kept                 123
% 1.64/1.87  clauses forward subsumed     262
% 1.64/1.87  clauses back subsumed          7
% 1.64/1.87  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.64/1.87  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.64/1.87  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.64/1.87  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.64/1.87  
% 1.64/1.87  Process 16494 finished Wed Jul 27 05:20:07 2022
% 1.64/1.87  Otter interrupted
% 1.64/1.87  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------