TSTP Solution File: GRP029-2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : GRP029-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:13:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.35s 1.83s
% Output   : Refutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  11 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  296 (  42   ~;  40   |;   0   &; 214   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   94 (   0   ^;  94   !;   0   ?;  94   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(product_type,type,
    product: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(not_right_identity_type,type,
    not_right_identity: $i > $i ).

thf(equalish_type,type,
    equalish: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(multiply_type,type,
    multiply: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(inverse_type,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

thf(identity_type,type,
    identity: $i ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( inverse @ A ) @ ( inverse @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse_substitution) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( inverse @ A ) @ ( inverse @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( equalish @ A @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( equalish @ A @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ A @ D )
      | ( product @ C @ B @ D ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_substitution2) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ A @ D )
      | ( product @ C @ B @ D ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( product @ ( not_right_identity @ A ) @ A @ ( not_right_identity @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_right_identity) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( product @ ( not_right_identity @ A ) @ A @ ( not_right_identity @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ C @ D )
      | ( product @ B @ C @ D ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_substitution1) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ C @ D )
      | ( product @ B @ C @ D ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( product @ A @ B @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',total_function1) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( product @ A @ B @ ( multiply @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ B @ D @ E )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ E @ F )
      | ( product @ C @ D @ F ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity2) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ B @ D @ E )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ E @ F )
      | ( product @ C @ D @ F ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ B @ D @ E )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ D @ F )
      | ( product @ A @ E @ F ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity1) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ B @ D @ E )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ D @ F )
      | ( product @ A @ E @ F ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( multiply @ C @ A ) @ ( multiply @ C @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_substitution2) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( multiply @ C @ A ) @ ( multiply @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( product @ identity @ A @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_identity) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( product @ identity @ A @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_substitution1) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( multiply @ A @ C ) @ ( multiply @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ D @ A )
      | ( product @ C @ D @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_substitution3) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( product @ C @ D @ A )
      | ( product @ C @ D @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ B @ D )
      | ( equalish @ C @ D ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',total_function2) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( product @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( product @ A @ B @ D )
      | ( equalish @ C @ D ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( product @ ( inverse @ A ) @ A @ identity ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_inverse) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( product @ ( inverse @ A ) @ A @ identity ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( equalish @ B @ C )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( equalish @ B @ C )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,29,41,17,27,39,35,31,43,23,38,21,33,36,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP029-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.16  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Fri May 19 02:26:13 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.93/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.43/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (135ms). 
% 1.43/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.85/1.28  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.85/1.28  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.85/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.85/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 15 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.12/1.37  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 15 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.12/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.12/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.12/1.40  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.35/1.83  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.35/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.35/1.83  % Time passed: 1282ms (effective reasoning time: 761ms)
% 3.35/1.83  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.35/1.83  % Axioms used in derivation (15): total_function1, product_substitution2, inverse_substitution, left_identity, left_inverse, reflexivity, associativity1, total_function2, symmetry, multiply_substitution1, product_substitution3, product_substitution1, multiply_substitution2, transitivity, associativity2
% 3.35/1.83  % No. of inferences in proof: 33
% 3.35/1.83  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1282 ms resp. 761 ms w/o parsing
% 3.45/1.87  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.45/1.87  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------