TSTP Solution File: GRP028-4 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : GRP028-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:52:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 1.00s
% Output : Proof 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GRP028-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 13:17:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.00 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.76/1.00 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 product(X, Y, U) & product(Y, Z, V) & product(X, V, W) ==> product(U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 product(X, Y, U) & product(Y, Z, V) & product(U, Z, W) ==> product(X, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 product(left_solution(X, Y), X, Y)
% 0.76/1.00 product(X, right_solution(X, Y), Y)
% 0.76/1.00 product(not_identity(X), X, not_identity(X)) ==> \bottom
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 This holds because
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 E:
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, U, Z, W) = product(U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f2(true__, X, Y, U, Z, W) = f1(product(X, Y, U), U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f3(product(X, V, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = true__
% 0.76/1.00 f3(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = f2(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f4(true__, X, V, W) = product(X, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f5(true__, X, Y, U, V, W) = f4(product(X, Y, U), X, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f6(product(U, Z, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = true__
% 0.76/1.00 f6(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = f5(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f7(product(not_identity(X), X, not_identity(X))) = true__
% 0.76/1.00 f7(true__) = false__
% 0.76/1.00 product(X, right_solution(X, Y), Y) = true__
% 0.76/1.00 product(left_solution(X, Y), X, Y) = true__
% 0.76/1.00 G:
% 0.76/1.00 true__ = false__
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 This holds because
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 f1(f1(true__, Y2, Y0, Y4), Y4, right_solution(Y0, right_solution(Y2, Y3)), Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(f1(true__, Y2, left_solution(Y1, right_solution(Y2, Y3)), Y4), Y4, Y1, Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(f1(true__, left_solution(Y2, Y3), Y0, Y4), Y4, right_solution(Y0, Y2), Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(f1(true__, left_solution(Y2, Y3), Y2, Y4), Y4, right_solution(X1, X1), Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(f1(true__, left_solution(Y2, Y3), left_solution(Y1, Y2), Y4), Y4, Y1, Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, Y0, right_solution(Y0, Y2), Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, Y3, right_solution(Y2, Y2), Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, Y3, right_solution(right_solution(left_solution(Y0, Y1), Y3), Y0), Y1) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, left_solution(Y1, Y1), Y2, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, left_solution(Y1, Y2), Y1, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, left_solution(Y1, left_solution(right_solution(Y1, Y2), Y3)), Y2, Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, left_solution(left_solution(X0, Y1), left_solution(X0, Y1)), Y2, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, left_solution(left_solution(Y1, Y2), left_solution(Y1, Y3)), Y2, Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f1(true__, right_solution(X1, X1), Y2, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f2(f1(true__, Y3, Y4, Y1), left_solution(Y1, Y2), Y3, Y5, Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f2(f1(true__, Y3, Y4, right_solution(X1, X1)), Y2, Y3, Y5, Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f2(f1(true__, Y3, Y4, right_solution(Y0, Y2)), Y0, Y3, Y5, Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f2(true__, X, Y, U, Z, W) -> f1(product(X, Y, U), U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f3(f1(true__, Y0, Y1, Y2), Y3, Y4, Y1, Y0, Y5, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f3(product(X, V, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f3(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> f2(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f4(f1(true__, Y3, Y0, left_solution(right_solution(Y0, Y2), Y4)), Y3, Y2, Y4) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f4(f1(true__, Y3, left_solution(Y1, Y2), left_solution(Y1, Y4)), Y3, Y2, Y4) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f4(f1(true__, Y4, Y1, Y1), Y4, Y3, Y3) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f4(f1(true__, Y4, left_solution(right_solution(Y1, Y2), Y3), Y1), Y4, Y3, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f4(true__, X, V, W) -> product(X, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f5(f1(true__, Y3, Y1, Y4), Y5, Y3, left_solution(Y1, Y2), Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f5(f1(true__, Y3, right_solution(X1, X1), Y4), Y5, Y3, Y2, Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f5(f1(true__, Y3, right_solution(Y0, Y2), Y4), Y5, Y3, Y0, Y4, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f5(true__, X, Y, U, V, W) -> f4(product(X, Y, U), X, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f6(f1(true__, Y0, Y1, Y2), Y3, Y1, Y4, Y5, Y0, Y2) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f6(product(U, Z, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f6(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> f5(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, V, W)
% 0.76/1.00 f7(f1(true__, not_identity(Y0), Y0, not_identity(Y0))) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f7(product(not_identity(X), X, not_identity(X))) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 f7(true__) -> false__
% 0.76/1.00 false__ -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 product(U, Z, W) -> f1(true__, U, Z, W)
% 0.76/1.00 product(X, right_solution(X, Y), Y) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 product(left_solution(X, Y), X, Y) -> true__
% 0.76/1.00 with the LPO induced by
% 0.76/1.00 not_identity > f7 > right_solution > left_solution > f3 > f2 > f6 > f5 > f4 > product > f1 > false__ > true__
% 0.76/1.01
% 0.76/1.01 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.76/1.01
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------