TSTP Solution File: GRP012+5 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP012+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.49s 0.68s
% Output   : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP012+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 13:42:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Tue Jun 14 13:42:44 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11476.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35  in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.51  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.51  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.51  number of clauses in intial UL: 3
% 0.18/0.51  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.18/0.51  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 30
% 0.18/0.51  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 62
% 0.18/0.51  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.51  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.18/0.51     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.18/0.51     distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.51     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.49/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.49/0.68  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 7 [ 1 12 108208 ] (0.00 seconds, 113819 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.31 sec ----> 376 [binary,375.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.49/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.49/0.68  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  1 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(C,D,F)|product(A,E,F).
% 0.49/0.68  2 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(A,E,F)|product(C,D,F).
% 0.49/0.68  3 [] {+} -product(inverse($c2),inverse($c1),$c5).
% 0.49/0.68  5 [] {+} product(A,$c5,A).
% 0.49/0.68  7 [] {+} product(A,inverse(A),$c5).
% 0.49/0.68  8 [] {+} product(inverse(A),A,$c5).
% 0.49/0.68  9 [] {-} product(inverse($c4),inverse($c3),$c2).
% 0.49/0.68  10 [] {+} product($c3,$c4,$c1).
% 0.49/0.68  113 [hyper,9,2,8,5] {-} product($c2,$c3,inverse($c4)).
% 0.49/0.68  150 [hyper,113,1,10,8] {+} product($c2,$c1,$c5).
% 0.49/0.68  167 [hyper,150,2,7,5] {-} product($c5,inverse($c1),$c2).
% 0.49/0.68  375 [hyper,167,2,5,8] {-} product(inverse($c2),inverse($c1),$c5).
% 0.49/0.68  376 [binary,375.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.68  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  ============ end of search ============
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  true clauses given           3      (21.4%)
% 0.49/0.68  false clauses given         11
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.49/0.68     5  3         8
% 0.49/0.68     6  6         44
% 0.49/0.68     7  50        32
% 0.49/0.68     8  30        31
% 0.49/0.68     9  29        6
% 0.49/0.68    10  5         6
% 0.49/0.68    11  8         2
% 0.49/0.68    12  2         32
% 0.49/0.68    13  26        5
% 0.49/0.68    14  5         7
% 0.49/0.68    16  0         1
% 0.49/0.68    17  1         0
% 0.49/0.68    18  0         5
% 0.49/0.68  tot:  165       179      (52.0% true)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Model 7 [ 1 12 108208 ] (0.00 seconds, 113819 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.49/0.68  
% 0.49/0.68  Process 11476 finished Tue Jun 14 13:42:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------