TSTP Solution File: GRP010-4 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP010-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:51:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.65s
% Output   : Proof 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP010-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:54:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.46/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.65  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(identity, X) = X
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(X), X) = identity
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(c, b) = identity
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(b, c) = identity ==> \bottom
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  This holds because
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  E:
% 0.46/0.65  	f1(identity) = false__
% 0.46/0.65  	f1(multiply(b, c)) = true__
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(c, b) = identity
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(identity, X) = X
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(X), X) = identity
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.46/0.65  G:
% 0.46/0.65  	true__ = false__
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  This holds because
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  	f1(identity) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65  	f1(multiply(b, c)) -> true__
% 0.46/0.65  	f1(multiply(c, b)) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65  	identity -> multiply(c, b)
% 0.46/0.65  	inverse(b) -> c
% 0.46/0.65  	inverse(c) -> b
% 0.46/0.65  	inverse(inverse(Y1)) -> Y1
% 0.46/0.65  	inverse(multiply(b, c)) -> multiply(b, c)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(Y0, inverse(Y0)) -> multiply(c, b)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(Y0, multiply(b, c)) -> Y0
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(Y1, multiply(c, b)) -> Y1
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(c, b) -> multiply(b, c)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(c, multiply(b, Y0)) -> Y0
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(identity, X) -> X
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(X), X) -> identity
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(Y1), multiply(Y1, Y2)) -> multiply(c, multiply(b, Y2))
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(c), X0) -> multiply(b, X0)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(inverse(X0)), X1) -> multiply(X0, X1)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(inverse(Y1)), multiply(c, b)) -> Y1
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(X0, X1)), multiply(X0, multiply(X1, Y1))) -> Y1
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, c)), multiply(Y0, X0)) -> multiply(b, X0)
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, inverse(Y2))), multiply(Y0, multiply(c, b))) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, multiply(c, b))), multiply(Y0, Y2)) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(b, c)), Y0) -> Y0
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(c, b)), Y1) -> Y1
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y1, Y2)), Y1)), multiply(c, b)) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65  	multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z) -> multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.46/0.65  	true__ -> false__
% 0.46/0.65  with the LPO induced by
% 0.46/0.65  	f1 > inverse > identity > c > b > multiply > true__ > false__
% 0.46/0.65  
% 0.46/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------