TSTP Solution File: GRP010-4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP010-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:39:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.78s 1.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  17 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  17   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > #nlpp > inverse > identity > c > b

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    multiply(b,c) != identity,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(identity,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    multiply(c,b) = identity,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z) = multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(inverse(X),X) = identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    multiply(b,c) != identity,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_4] : ( multiply(identity,X_4) = X_4 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    multiply(c,b) = identity,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ! [X_8,Y_9,Z_10] : ( multiply(multiply(X_8,Y_9),Z_10) = multiply(X_8,multiply(Y_9,Z_10)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [Z_10] : ( multiply(c,multiply(b,Z_10)) = multiply(identity,Z_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_31]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [Z_10] : ( multiply(c,multiply(b,Z_10)) = Z_10 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_52]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_5] : ( multiply(inverse(X_5),X_5) = identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [X_5,Z_10] : ( multiply(inverse(X_5),multiply(X_5,Z_10)) = multiply(identity,Z_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_31]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ! [X_12,Z_13] : ( multiply(inverse(X_12),multiply(X_12,Z_13)) = Z_13 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_46]) ).

tff(c_246,plain,
    ! [Z_17] : ( multiply(inverse(c),Z_17) = multiply(b,Z_17) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_59,c_73]) ).

tff(c_266,plain,
    multiply(b,c) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_246,c_6]) ).

tff(c_284,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_266]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GRP010-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:12:07 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.78/1.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.78/1.90  
% 2.78/1.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.07/1.93  
% 3.07/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.07/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.94  #Ref     : 0
% 3.07/1.94  #Sup     : 71
% 3.07/1.94  #Fact    : 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Define  : 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Split   : 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Chain   : 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Close   : 0
% 3.12/1.94  
% 3.12/1.94  Ordering : KBO
% 3.12/1.94  
% 3.12/1.94  Simplification rules
% 3.12/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.12/1.94  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Demod        : 34
% 3.12/1.94  #Tautology    : 47
% 3.12/1.94  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.12/1.94  #BackRed      : 2
% 3.12/1.94  
% 3.12/1.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.12/1.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.12/1.94  
% 3.12/1.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.12/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.12/1.94  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 3.12/1.94  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.12/1.94  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.12/1.94  Main loop            : 0.31
% 3.12/1.94  Inferencing          : 0.12
% 3.12/1.94  Reduction            : 0.10
% 3.12/1.94  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.12/1.94  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.12/1.94  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.12/1.94  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.12/1.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.12/1.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.12/1.94  Total                : 0.81
% 3.12/1.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.12/1.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.12/1.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.12/1.94  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------