TSTP Solution File: GRP009-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GRP009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:50:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 16 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f547,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f530,f326]) ).
fof(f326,plain,
product(identity,inverse(b),c),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f4,f201,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ product(X1,X2,X5)
| product(X4,X2,X3)
| sP0(X5,X4,X3,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12_D]) ).
fof(f12_D,plain,
! [X1,X3,X4,X5] :
( ! [X2] :
( ~ product(X1,X2,X5)
| product(X4,X2,X3) )
<=> ~ sP0(X5,X4,X3,X1) ),
introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).
fof(f201,plain,
~ sP0(identity,identity,c,b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f10,f2,f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ sP0(X5,X4,X3,X1)
| ~ product(X0,X5,X3)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X4) ),
inference(general_splitting,[],[f8,f12_D]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ product(X0,X1,X4)
| ~ product(X0,X5,X3)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X5)
| product(X4,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity2) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : product(X0,identity,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
product(c,b,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_an_inverse_of_b) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : product(X0,inverse(X0),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).
fof(f530,plain,
~ product(identity,inverse(b),c),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f138,f301,f13]) ).
fof(f301,plain,
product(identity,inverse(b),a),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f4,f200,f12]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
~ sP0(identity,identity,a,b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f9,f2,f13]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
product(a,b,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_an_inverse_of_b) ).
fof(f138,plain,
! [X0] : sP0(X0,c,a,X0),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f36,f2,f12]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
~ product(c,identity,a),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f11,f2,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
| X2 = X3
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',total_function2) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
a != c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_equals_c) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 04:47:34 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % (6242)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.38 % (6245)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.38 % (6246)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6243)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6244)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6245)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6247)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6248)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (6249)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Memory used [KB]: 909
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)Instructions burned: 17 (million)
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (6249)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (6242)Success in time 0.028 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------