TSTP Solution File: GRP004-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:03:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GRP004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 09:19:12 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.35 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.11/0.35 #
% 0.11/0.35 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.35 # Number of axioms: 5 Number of unprocessed: 5
% 0.11/0.35 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.11/0.35 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.11/0.35 # Hello from C++
% 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.11/0.36 # 5 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.11/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.11/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.11/0.36 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.11/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.11/0.36 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.11/0.36 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.11/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.11/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.11/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.11/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (product(identity,X1,X1))).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (product(inverse(X1),X1,identity))).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~product(a,X1,identity))).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X4,X1))).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X1,X6,X4))).
% 0.11/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.11/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.11/0.36 # Found 8 steps
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~product(a,identity,identity)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~product(a,identity,identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~product(identity,identity,identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~product(identity,identity,identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~product(identity,identity,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_217, plain, (~product(identity,a,a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_218, plain, (~product(inverse(a),a,identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.11/0.36 cnf(i_0_219, plain, (~product(identity,inverse(a),identity)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_219, ...])).
% 0.11/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.11/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.11/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.11/0.36 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.11/0.36 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on
% 0.11/0.36 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.11/0.36 # Proof search is over...
% 0.11/0.36 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------