TSTP Solution File: GRP003-2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3STLOnqfdH true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:49:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3STLOnqfdH true
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 01:32:47 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/0.90 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 1.37/0.90 % done 177 iterations in 0.110s
% 1.37/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.37/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/0.90 thf(product_type, type, product: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(identity_type, type, identity: $i).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(prove_right_identity, conjecture, (product @ a @ identity @ a)).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( product @ a @ identity @ a )),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_right_identity])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (~ (product @ a @ identity @ a)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(left_identity, axiom, (product @ identity @ X @ X)).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (product @ identity @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(left_inverse, axiom, (product @ ( inverse @ X ) @ X @ identity)).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: (product @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0 @ identity)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (product @ identity @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: (product @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0 @ identity)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(associativity1, axiom,
% 1.37/0.90 (( ~( product @ X @ Y @ U ) ) | ( ~( product @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) |
% 1.37/0.90 ( ~( product @ U @ Z @ W ) ) | ( product @ X @ V @ W ))).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X4)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X2 @ X3 @ X5)
% 1.37/0.90 | (product @ X0 @ X4 @ X5))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity1])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 ( (product @ (inverse @ X0) @ X2 @ X1)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ identity @ X3 @ X1)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X0 @ X3 @ X2))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl158, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 (~ (product @ X2 @ X0 @ X1) | (product @ (inverse @ X2) @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl221, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: (product @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) @ identity @ X0)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl158])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(associativity2, axiom,
% 1.37/0.90 (( ~( product @ X @ Y @ U ) ) | ( ~( product @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) |
% 1.37/0.90 ( ~( product @ X @ V @ W ) ) | ( product @ U @ Z @ W ))).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X4)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X0 @ X4 @ X5)
% 1.37/0.90 | (product @ X2 @ X3 @ X5))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity2])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 ( (product @ X0 @ X3 @ X0)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.37/0.90 | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl450, plain,
% 1.37/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.37/0.90 (~ (product @ identity @ X1 @ identity) | (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl221, zip_derived_cl41])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl457, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (product @ X0 @ identity @ X0)),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl450])).
% 1.37/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl463, plain, ($false),
% 1.37/0.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl457])).
% 1.37/0.90
% 1.37/0.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/0.90
% 1.37/0.90
% 1.37/0.90 % Terminating...
% 1.83/1.01 % Runner terminated.
% 1.83/1.02 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------