TSTP Solution File: GRP001-4 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP001-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:16:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP001-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 01:31:30 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 1 (squareness): multiply(X, X) = identity.
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 2 (left_identity): multiply(identity, X) = X.
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 3 (a_times_b_is_c): multiply(a, b) = c.
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 4 (associativity): multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z)).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 5: multiply(X, multiply(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(X, multiply(X, Y))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 4 (associativity) R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(multiply(X, X), Y)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (squareness) }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(identity, Y)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (left_identity) }
% 0.14/0.39 Y
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 6: multiply(a, multiply(b, X)) = multiply(c, X).
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(b, X))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 4 (associativity) R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(multiply(a, b), X)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 3 (a_times_b_is_c) }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(c, X)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Goal 1 (prove_b_times_a_is_c): multiply(b, a) = c.
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(b, a)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(a, multiply(b, a)))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(c, a))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(c, multiply(a, multiply(a, a))))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (squareness) }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(c, multiply(a, identity)))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (squareness) R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(c, multiply(a, multiply(b, b))))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, multiply(c, multiply(c, b)))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(a, b)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 3 (a_times_b_is_c) }
% 0.14/0.39 c
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------